Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
13341

Case T-82/23: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Nextrend v EUIPO — Xiamen Axent Corporation and Axent Switzerland (Toilet units (part of –)) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing toilet units (part of — ) — Earlier Community design — Grounds for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Degree of freedom of the designer — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
13342

Case C-694/23,  Edo : Order of the Court of 21 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen – Germany) – F.A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status granted in one Member State – Application for international protection in a second Member State – Scope of examination of such an application in a second Member State – Risk of dividing the family of the applicant for international protection in the event of his removal)

cjeu_case ·
13343

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Hoffmann GmbH Qualitätswerkzeuge v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Holex – Earlier EU figurative mark MOLDEX – Relative ground for refusal – Proof of genuine use – No likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-767/22.

cjeu_case ·
13344

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Hoffmann GmbH Qualitätswerkzeuge v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Holex – Earlier EU figurative mark MOLDEX – Relative ground for refusal – Proof of genuine use – No likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-767/22.

cjeu_case ·
13349

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 February 2024 (Extracts).#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance cypermethrin – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Identification of critical areas of concern by EFSA – Risk assessment and risk management – Precautionary principle – Discretion enjoyed by the Commission.#Case T-536/22.

cjeu_case ·
13350

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 February 2024 (Extracts).#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance cypermethrin – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Identification of critical areas of concern by EFSA – Risk assessment and risk management – Precautionary principle – Discretion enjoyed by the Commission.#Case T-536/22.

cjeu_case ·
13351

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-117/22.

cjeu_case ·
13352

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-117/22.

cjeu_case ·
13356

Case T-536/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — PAN Europe v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance cypermethrin — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 — Request for internal review — Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Rejection of the request — Identification of critical areas of concern by EFSA — Risk assessment and risk management — Precautionary principle — Discretion enjoyed by the Commission)

cjeu_case ·
13357

Case T-117/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Grodno Azot and Khimvolokno Plant v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus — Freezing of funds — Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists — Concept of ‘support for the regime’ — State-owned enterprise — Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·