13181Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BERTRAND PUMA La griffe boulangère – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-184/23.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13182Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Drinks Prod SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark IGISAN – Earlier EU word mark IGNISAN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-164/23.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13183Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Drinks Prod SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark IGISAN – Earlier EU word mark IGNISAN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-164/23.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13184Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Atomico Investment Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark atomic fund – Earlier EU word mark ATOMICO – Lack of evidence of the reputation of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division.#Case T-98/23.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13185Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Atomico Investment Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark atomic fund – Earlier EU word mark ATOMICO – Lack of evidence of the reputation of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division.#Case T-98/23.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13186Case T-385/23: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Officecjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13187Case T-279/23: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO – Kåska (smål)cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13188Case T-184/23: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Puma v EUIPO – Société d’équipements de boulangerie pâtisserie (BERTRAND PUMA La griffe boulangère)cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13189Case T-164/23: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Drinks Prod v EUIPO – Wolff and Illg (IGISAN)cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13190Case T-98/23: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Atomico Investment v EUIPO – Gomes Tominaga (atomic fund)cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13191Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark Compton – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-747/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13192Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark Compton – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-747/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13193Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Word mark COMPTON – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-746/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13194Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Word mark COMPTON – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-746/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13195Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#House Foods Group, Inc. v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the plant variety SK20 – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – No interest in bringing proceedings – Article 81(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94.#Case T-556/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13196Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#House Foods Group, Inc. v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the plant variety SK20 – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – No interest in bringing proceedings – Article 81(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94.#Case T-556/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13197Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Action for annulment and for damages – Institutional law – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Refusal to appoint one of the candidates nominated by [confidential] 2 Confidential data removed. – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Confirmatory measure – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility – Causal link.#Case T-442/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13198Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 28 février 2024.#PU contre Parquet européen.#Recours en annulation et en indemnité – Droit institutionnel – Règlement (UE) 2017/1939 – Nomination des procureurs européens délégués du Parquet européen – Refus de nomination de l’un des candidats désignés par la [confidentiel]1 Données confidentielles occultées. – Délai de recours – Acte confirmatif – Défaut d’affectation directe – Irrecevabilité – Lien de causalité.#Affaire T-442/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13199Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2021 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Rule of correspondence – Consideration of comparative merits – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-318/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024
13200Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2021 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Rule of correspondence – Consideration of comparative merits – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-318/22.cjeu_case · February 28, 2024