Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
12647

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Danske Slagtermestre v European Commission.#State aid – Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water – Complaint from a competitor – Decision finding no State aid at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Requirement of impartiality – Objective impartiality – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Market economy operator principle – Ex ante incremental profitability analysis – Commission Notice on the notion of State aid.#Case T-486/18 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
12648

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Danske Slagtermestre v European Commission.#State aid – Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water – Complaint from a competitor – Decision finding no State aid at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Requirement of impartiality – Objective impartiality – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Market economy operator principle – Ex ante incremental profitability analysis – Commission Notice on the notion of State aid.#Case T-486/18 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
12656

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#YG and NI v AXA Bank Europe SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-628/23.

cjeu_case ·
12657

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#YG and NI v AXA Bank Europe SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-628/23.

cjeu_case ·
12659

C-628/23, AXA Bank Europe and Others: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék – Hungary) – YG, NI v AXA Bank Europe SA, OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
12660

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#T. S.A. v Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-22/22.

cjeu_case ·