12621Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Portugal – Concept of ‘permanent grassland – Pro-rata system – On-the-spot checks – Proportionality – Principle of sincere cooperation – Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 34(5) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014.#Case T-512/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12622Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Portugal – Concept of ‘permanent grassland – Pro-rata system – On-the-spot checks – Proportionality – Principle of sincere cooperation – Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 34(5) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014.#Case T-512/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12623Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Columbus Stainless (Pty) Ltd v European Commission.#Protective measures – Steel products market – Imports of certain steel products – Economic Partnership Agreement – Southern African Development Community – Exemption clause – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/664 – Initiation of an investigation – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-445/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12624Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Columbus Stainless (Pty) Ltd v European Commission.#Protective measures – Steel products market – Imports of certain steel products – Economic Partnership Agreement – Southern African Development Community – Exemption clause – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/664 – Initiation of an investigation – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-445/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12625Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2024.#Dexia, formerly Dexia Crédit Local v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-411/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12626Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2024.#Dexia, formerly Dexia Crédit Local v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-411/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12627Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mikhail Fridman v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting actions and policies’ Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially’ and ‘benefitting from’ Russian decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-304/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12628Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mikhail Fridman v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting actions and policies’ Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially’ and ‘benefitting from’ Russian decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-304/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12629Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Petr Aven v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting or implementing actions or policies’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially, Russian decision-makers’ and of ‘benefitting’ from those decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-301/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12630Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Petr Aven v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting or implementing actions or policies’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially, Russian decision-makers’ and of ‘benefitting’ from those decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-301/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12631Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#AL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Dependent child allowances – Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Person treated as a dependent child – Conditions for granting – Article 2(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Actual maintenance – Recovery of overpayments – Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-50/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12632Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#AL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Dependent child allowances – Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Person treated as a dependent child – Conditions for granting – Article 2(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Actual maintenance – Recovery of overpayments – Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-50/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12633Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#AL v Council of the European Union.#Data not found.#Case T-22/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12634Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#AL v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Removal from post – OLAF investigation – Principle of sound administration – Article 22 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-22/22.cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12635Case T-279/22: Order of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Biogen Netherlands v Commissioncjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12636Case T-278/22: Order of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Biogen Netherlands v Commissioncjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12637Case T-269/22: Order of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Biogen Netherlands v Commissioncjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12638Case T-749/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment and Argestcjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12639Case T-654/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – M&T 1997 v EUIPO – VDS Czmyr Kowalik (Door and window handles)cjeu_case · April 10, 2024
12640Case T-512/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Portugal v Commissioncjeu_case · April 10, 2024