Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
12603

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#IB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to resume the invalidity procedure – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Disciplinary proceedings – Removal from post – Liability.#Case T-38/23.

cjeu_case ·
12604

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#IB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to resume the invalidity procedure – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Disciplinary proceedings – Removal from post – Liability.#Case T-38/23.

cjeu_case ·
12614

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Lear Corporation Hungary Autóipari Gyártó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 183 – Right to deduct input VAT – Rules governing exercise of that right – Late refund – Delay caused by the application of a national provision – Effect of a preliminary ruling given by the Court after those facts occurred – Late payment interest – Limitation – Principles of equivalence, effectiveness and fiscal neutrality.#Case C-532/23.

cjeu_case ·
12615

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Lear Corporation Hungary Autóipari Gyártó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 183 – Right to deduct input VAT – Rules governing exercise of that right – Late refund – Delay caused by the application of a national provision – Effect of a preliminary ruling given by the Court after those facts occurred – Late payment interest – Limitation – Principles of equivalence, effectiveness and fiscal neutrality.#Case C-532/23.

cjeu_case ·
12616

Case C-532/23, Lear Corporation Hungary: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Lear Corporation Hungary Autóipari Gyártó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága ((Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article183 – Right to deduct input VAT – Rules governing exercise of that right – Late refund – Delay caused by the application of a national provision – Effect of a preliminary ruling given by the Court after those facts occurred – Late payment interest – Limitation – Principles of equivalence, effectiveness and fiscal neutrality)

cjeu_case ·
12617

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#European Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment SA and Argest SA.#Arbitration clause – Contract for preservation and safety works on the Maison Jean Monnet – Framework contract for architectural, technical and financial assistance and advice – Damage affecting the roof – Claim for compensation – 10-year guarantee – Application of French and Luxembourg law – Default interest.#Case T-749/22.

cjeu_case ·
12618

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#European Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment SA and Argest SA.#Arbitration clause – Contract for preservation and safety works on the Maison Jean Monnet – Framework contract for architectural, technical and financial assistance and advice – Damage affecting the roof – Claim for compensation – 10-year guarantee – Application of French and Luxembourg law – Default interest.#Case T-749/22.

cjeu_case ·