Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
12341

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#F C C and M A B v Caixabank SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan contract – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period starts to run.#Case C-484/21.

cjeu_case ·
12342

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 25 April 2024.#Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Online social networks – General terms of use relating to contracts concluded between a digital platform and a user – Personalised advertising – Article 5(1)(b) – Principle of purpose limitation – Article 5(1)(c) – Principle of data minimisation – Article 9(1) and (2) – Processing of special categories of personal data – Data concerning sexual orientation – Data which are made public by the data subject.#Case C-446/21.

cjeu_case ·
12343

Case C-561/21,  Banco Santander (Point from which the limitation period starts to run): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – GP, BG v Banco Santander SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan contract – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period for the action for restitution starts to run)

cjeu_case ·
12344

Case C-484/21,  Caixabank (Limitation period): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 20 de Barcelona – Spain) – F C C, M A B v Caixabank SA, formerly Bankia SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan contract – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period starts to run)

cjeu_case ·
12356

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 April 2024.#Tsakiris AE Paragogis & Emporias Trofimon v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Le Petit Déjeuner TSAKIRIS FAMILY – Earlier national figurative mark TSAKIRIS CHIPS – Damage to reputation – Use without due cause – Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 81 TFEU.#Case T-303/23.

cjeu_case ·
12357

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 April 2024.#Tsakiris AE Paragogis & Emporias Trofimon v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Le Petit Déjeuner TSAKIRIS FAMILY – Earlier national figurative mark TSAKIRIS CHIPS – Damage to reputation – Use without due cause – Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 81 TFEU.#Case T-303/23.

cjeu_case ·
12360

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 April 2024 (Extracts).#Kneipp GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Joyful by nature – Earlier EU word mark JOY – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence in support of the reputation – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark.#Case T-157/23.

cjeu_case ·