Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
11921

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 May 2024.#Y.Ya. v K.P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principle of judicial independence – Instruction given by a higher court to a court of first instance to rule on the costs – National provisions relating to the detailed rules for the secondment of judges to a higher court – Interpretation sought by the court of first instance – Necessity of the interpretation sought to enable the referring court to give judgment – None – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-797/21.

cjeu_case ·
11922

Case C-797/21, Y.Ya. (Secondment of judges): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – Y. Ya v K.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principle of judicial independence – Instruction given by a higher court to a court of first instance to rule on the costs – National provisions relating to the detailed rules for the secondment of judges to a higher court – Interpretation sought by the court of first instance – Necessity of the interpretation sought to enable the referring court to give judgment – None – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
11940

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 May 2024.#Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-208/24 P.

cjeu_case ·