Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
11881

Cases T-200/22 and T-314/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Poland v Commission (Environment – Lignite mining activities at an open-cast mine – Turów lignite mine (Poland) – Law governing the institutions – Failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of debts by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Removal of the case in the main proceedings from the register – No retroactive effect on the interim measures ordered – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
11882

Case T-116/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Belavia v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Organisation of activities of the Lukashenko regime facilitating the illegal crossing of the external borders of the European Union or contribution to those activities – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
11883

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Prokurator Generalny v D.J. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-43/22.

cjeu_case ·
11884

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Prokurator Generalny v D.J. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-43/22.

cjeu_case ·
11885

Case C-43/22, Prokurator Generalny (Polish extraordinary appeal II): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Prokurator Generalny (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
11886

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
11887

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
11888

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
11889

Case T-360/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Portigon v SRB (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
11890

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-720/21.

cjeu_case ·
11891

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-720/21.

cjeu_case ·
11892

Case C-720/21, Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Polish extraordinary appeal): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
11893

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Decal España, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-509/14.

cjeu_case ·
11894

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Decal España, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-509/14.

cjeu_case ·
11895

Case T-509/14: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Decal España v Commission (State aid - Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors - Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) - Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part - Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute - No need to adjudicate in part - New aid - Recovery - Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market - Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities)

cjeu_case ·
11896

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 May 2024.#Cruelty Free Europe (CFE) v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – ECHA – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-79/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
11898

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 May 2024.#Cruelty Free Europe v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – ECHA – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-78/24 P.

cjeu_case ·