Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
10505

Order of the Court of 3 September 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-334/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
10506

Order of the Court of 3 September 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-334/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
10507

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Viviane Van Oosterwijck v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Officials – Surviving spouse – Survivor’s pension – Eligibility conditions – Duration of the marriage – Article 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-109/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
10508

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Viviane Van Oosterwijck v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Officials – Surviving spouse – Survivor’s pension – Eligibility conditions – Duration of the marriage – Article 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-109/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
10514

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Investcapital Ltd v TK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer clearly deducible from the case-law of the Court or leaving no room for reasonable doubt – Directive 2008/52/EC – Mediation in civil and commercial matters – National legislation providing for a mandatory information session on mediation – Constitutional case-law invalidating that legislation – Compatibility of that case-law with the directive – Principle of primacy of EU law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Possibility for the court to review an unfair term.#Case C-658/23.

cjeu_case ·
10515

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Investcapital Ltd v TK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 3 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer clearly deducible from the case-law of the Court or leaving no room for reasonable doubt – Directive 2008/52/EC – Mediation in civil and commercial matters – National legislation providing for a mandatory information session on mediation – Constitutional case-law invalidating that legislation – Compatibility of that case-law with the directive – Principle of primacy of EU law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Possibility for the court to review an unfair term.#Case C-658/23.

cjeu_case ·
10517

Case C-658/23, Investcapital: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 3 Bucureşti – Romania) – Investcapital Ltd v TK (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer clearly deducible from the case-law of the Court or leaving no room for reasonable doubt – Directive 2008/52/EC – Mediation in civil and commercial matters – National legislation providing for a mandatory information session on mediation – Constitutional case-law invalidating that legislation – Compatibility of that case-law with the directive – Principle of primacy of EU law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Possibility for the court to review an unfair term)

cjeu_case ·
10519

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Illumina, Inc. and Grail LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – Genetic sequencing systems – Acquisition by Illumina Inc. of sole control over Grail LLC – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Article 22 – Referral request from a national competition authority not having competence under national law to examine the concentration – Decision of the European Commission to examine that concentration – Commission decisions accepting requests from other national competition authorities to join the referral request – Competence of the Commission – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-611/22 P and C-625/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
10520

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Illumina Inc. and Grail LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – Genetic sequencing systems – Acquisition by Illumina Inc. of sole control over Grail LLC – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Article 22 – Referral request from a national competition authority not having competence under national law to examine the concentration – Decision of the European Commission to examine that concentration – Commission decisions accepting requests from other national competition authorities to join the referral request – Competence of the Commission – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-611/22 P and C-625/22 P.

cjeu_case ·