10341Case T-2/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2024 – Sveza Verkhnyaya Sinyachikha and Others v Commission (Dumping – Imports of birch plywood originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 – Adjustment – Export price – Single economic entity – Commission contracts – Normal value – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Selling, general and administrative costs – Dividends – Management costs – Article 2(6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Product concerned – Market segmentation – Causal link – Other injury factors – Article 3(3), (6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2024 г.
10342Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#CQ v European Court of Auditors.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the Court of Auditors – Activity incompatible with the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors – Expenses considered undue – Recovery decision – Decision of the Court ruling on the breach of the obligations arising from the office of Member of the Court of Auditors – Lawfulness of OLAF’s investigation and final report – Duty to state reasons – Limitation period – Article 98(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Legitimate expectations – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-386/19.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2024 г.
10343Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#CQ v European Court of Auditors.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the Court of Auditors – Activity incompatible with the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors – Expenses considered undue – Recovery decision – Decision of the Court of Justice ruling on the breach of the obligations arising from the office of Member of the Court of Auditors – Lawfulness of OLAF’s investigation and final report – Duty to state reasons – Limitation period – Article 98(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Legitimate expectations – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-386/19.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2024 г.
10344Case T-386/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2024 – CQ v Court of Auditors (Law governing the institutions – Member of the Court of Auditors – Activity incompatible with the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors – Expenditure considered to be undue – Recovery decision – Decision of the Court of Justice ruling on a breach of the obligations arising from the office of Member of the Court of Auditors – Regularity of OLAF’s investigation and final report – Obligation to state reasons – Limitation period – Article 98(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Legitimate expectations – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2024 г.
10346Case T-470/24: Action brought on 10 September 2024 – ITB v EUIPO (TRADEPRO)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10347Case T-469/24: Action brought on 10 September 2024 – Lorenz Switzerland v EUIPO – Wawelskie Alkohole Łukasz Bylica (Piekarnia i Kawiarnia Lajkonik)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10348Case T-468/24: Action brought on 10 September 2024 – FB v Parliamentcjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10349Case T-210/24: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2024 – the airscreen company v EUIPO – Moviescreens Rental (AIRSCREEN)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10350Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#SwiftSuit Legal Tech GmbH v WIENER LINIEN GmbH & Co KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Article 2(2)(b) – Prohibition of indirect discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin – Public transport travel cards available to students, the price of which depends on their place of residence – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-65/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10351Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Wiener Linien GmbH & Co KG v SwiftSuit Legal Tech GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Article 2(2)(b) – Prohibition of indirect discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin – Public transport travel cards available to students, the price of which depends on their place of residence – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-65/24.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10352Case C-590/24, AK Dlhopolec and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 10 September 2024 – Criminal proceedings against AK Dlhopolec s.r.o., MABONEX SLOVAKIA spol. s r.o., A.B. and X.Y.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10353Case C-588/24, Imballaggi Piemontesi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 10 September 2024 – Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10354Case C-587/24, VOX and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Spain) lodged on 10 September 2024 – Ministerio Fiscal, Administración General del Estado, Partido político VOX v NQ, DL, MUcjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10355Case C-65/24, SwiftSuit Legal Tech: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien – Austria) – SwiftSuit Legal Tech GmbH v WIENER LINIEN GmbH & Co KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Article 2(2)(b) – Prohibition of indirect discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin – Public transport travel cards available to students, the price of which depends on their place of residence – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10356Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Antifraudă Fiscală.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 2(2)(a) – Jurisdiction of the Court – Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU – Article 215 TFEU – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Principle of legal certainty and principle that penalties must be defined by law – Brokering services in relation to military equipment – Prohibition on providing such services – Failure to notify the competent national authorities – Administrative offence – Fine – Automatic confiscation of the amounts received in consideration for the prohibited transaction.#Case C-351/22.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10357Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Antifraudă Fiscală.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 2(2)(a) – Jurisdiction of the Court – Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU – Article 215 TFEU – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Principle of legal certainty and principle that penalties must be defined by law – Brokering services in relation to military equipment – Prohibition on providing such services – Failure to notify the competent national authorities – Administrative offence – Fine – Automatic confiscation of the amounts received in consideration for the prohibited transaction.#Case C-351/22.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10358Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Markets for online general search services and specialised product search services – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Leveraging abuse – Competition on the merits or anticompetitive practice – Dominant undertaking favouring the display of results from its own specialised search service – Potential anticompetitive effects – Causal link between abuse and effects – Burden of proof – Counterfactual scenario – Capability of foreclosing – ‘As-efficient competitor’ test.#Case C-48/22 P.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10359Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Markets for online general search services and specialised product search services – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Leveraging abuse – Competition on the merits or anticompetitive practice – Dominant undertaking favouring the display of results from its own specialised search service – Potential anticompetitive effects – Causal link between abuse and effects – Burden of proof – Counterfactual scenario – Capability of foreclosing – ‘As-efficient competitor’ test.#Case C-48/22 P.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.
10360Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.##Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Action for damages – Damage allegedly suffered as a result of various acts and omissions by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) in the implementation of that joint action – Insufficient investigation of the torture, disappearance and killing of persons – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to rule on that action – Last sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU.#Joined Cases C-29/22 P and C-44/22 P.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2024 г.