982Case C-204/25, Kempen Advies Beerse and Others: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie – Belgium) – Kempen Advies Beerse BV, Compagnie LLC BV, FP Verzekeringen BV, OL v Bank Nagelmackers NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 86/653/EEC – Article 15(2) – Article 19 – Self-employed commercial agents – Notice period – Date of expiry of the commercial agency contract)cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
983Case C-132/25, M.M. Ristorazione: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 9(5) – Provisional measures – Failure to institute proceedings leading to a decision on the merits of the case – National legislation providing for the continuation of the effects of provisional measures intended to anticipate the effects of a decision on the merits of the case)cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
984Case C-116/25, NOI – Blagoevgrad: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Blagoevgrad – Bulgaria) – Ts. E. S. v Direktor na Teritorialno podelenie na Natsionalnia osiguritelen institut – Blagoevgrad (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Unemployment benefits – Calculation – Article 62(1) and (2) – Last activity as an employed or self-employed person pursued under the legislation of a Member State – Article 62(3) – Residence of the recipient of unemployment benefits in a Member State other than the competent Member State – Calculation rule which does not take into account exclusively the salary or professional income received by the person concerned in respect of his or her last activity as an employed or self-employed person – National legislation providing for a different calculation rule for persons who carried out their last employment in another Member State)cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
985Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#YH contre Widl GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations des États membres relatives aux machines – Normes et réglementations techniques – Directive 98/37/CE – Machine munie de dispositifs d’arrêt normal et d’urgence – Exigences essentielles de sécurité et de santé – Risques pour la sécurité et la santé des personnes – Déclenchement inconscient ou conscient de l’un des dispositifs d’arrêt – Blocage du dispositif d’arrêt d’urgence – Manœuvre appropriée pouvant débloquer le dispositif d’arrêt d’urgence.#Affaire C-887/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
986Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#YH v Widl GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery – Technical standards and regulations – Directive 98/37/EC – Machinery fitted with normal and emergency stopping devices – Essential health and safety requirements – Risks for the health and safety of individuals – Inadvertent or deliberate release of one of the stopping devices – Engagement of the emergency stop device – Appropriate operation to disengage the emergency stopping device.#Case C-887/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
987Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Remuneration – Dependent child allowances – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpayments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Action for annulment – Article 91 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Distortion – Assessment of the legality of an act at the date of its adoption – Retroactive scope of a judgment delivered by a national court – Res judicata.#Case C-882/24 P.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
988Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Remuneration – Dependent child allowances – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpayments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Action for annulment – Article 91 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Distortion – Assessment of the legality of an act at the date of its adoption – Retroactive scope of a judgment delivered by a national court – Res judicata.#Case C-882/24 P.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
989Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#Pescheria Il Granchio Blu di JC contre Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides de minimis – Règlement (UE) no 1407/2013 – Règlement (UE) no 1408/2013 – Règlement (UE) no 717/2014 – Champs d’application respectifs – Règlement (UE) no 1379/2013 – Secteur de la pêche et de l’aquaculture – Organisation commune des marchés – Entreprises opérant dans la production, la transformation et la commercialisation des produits halieutiques – Commerce de détail – Réglementation nationale prévoyant des aides de minimis en faveur des entreprises situées dans des zones touchées par des séismes.#Affaire C-811/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
990Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Pescheria Il Granchio Blu di JC v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – De minimis aid – Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 – Regulation (EU) No 717/2014 – Respective scopes – Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 – Fishery and aquaculture sector – Common organisation of the markets – Undertakings operating in the production, processing and marketing of fishery products – Retail trade – National legislation providing for de minimis aid for undertakings located in zones affected by earthquakes.#Case C-811/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
991Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#HM and JD v AXA Bank Belgium SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Article 6(1) – Effects of the finding that such a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Article 7(1) – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Transfer of a contract among sellers or suppliers under national law – Seller or supplier against whom the consumer may assert the legal consequences of the invalidity of an unfair term in the transferred contract.#Case C-761/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
992Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#P.W. contre Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrats de crédit aux consommateurs – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 3, sous j) – Article 10, paragraphe 2, sous f) – Notion de “taux débiteur” – Notion de “montant de crédit prélevé” – Article 3, sous g) – Notion de “coût total du crédit pour le consommateur” – Perception d’intérêts sur un montant correspondant à un coût du crédit – Prime d’assurance.#Affaire C-744/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
993Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#P.W. v Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(j) – Article 10(2)(f) – The concept of ‘borrowing rate’ – The concept of ‘amount of credit drawn down’ – Article 3(g) – The concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ – Charging interest on an amount corresponding to the cost of the credit – Insurance premium.#Case C-744/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
994Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#LQ and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-528/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
995Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#LQ and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-528/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
996Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#Freie Hansestadt Bremen contre DT.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Directive 2008/115/CE – Retour des ressortissants d’un pays tiers en séjour irrégulier – Article 11, paragraphe 2 – Interdiction d’entrée – Durée – Réglementation nationale exigeant, en principe, une interdiction d’entrée et de séjour à durée illimitée dans certains cas – Menace terroriste.#Affaire C-446/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
997Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Freie Hansestadt Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 11(2) – Entry ban – Duration – National legislation which requires, in principle, an indefinite ban on entry and stay in certain cases – Terrorist threat.#Case C-446/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026
998Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#EG Labo Laboratoires Eurogenerics SAS and Theramex France SAS v Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) and Biogaran SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2001/83/EC – Medicinal products for human use – Articles 28 and 29 – Decentralised procedure for marketing authorisation for a medicinal product – Article 10 – Generic medicinal product – Abridged procedure for granting a marketing authorisation – Biological medicinal product serving as reference medicinal product for a chemical medicinal product – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member States concerned to determine whether there is a potential serious risk for public health – Jurisdiction of those courts to review the conditions for granting a marketing authorisation for a generic medicinal product.#Case C-118/24.cjeu_case · April 22, 2026