Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
9641

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark.#Case T-194/23.

cjeu_case ·
9645

Case T-508/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Medspa v EUIPO – Hic (ALDO COPPOLA AMO) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ALDO COPPOLA AMO – Earlier national word marks and earlier international registration of word mark MIAMO – Earlier national figurative mark and earlier international registration of figurative mark MIAMO Healthy Skin System – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9646

Case T-506/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Freistaat Bayern v EUIPO – Bundesverband Souvenir Geschenke Ehrenpreise (Neuschwanstein) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Neuschwanstein – Earlier business names Neuschwanstein and Schloss Neuschwanstein – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
9648

Case T-344/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Sergio Rossi v EUIPO –Stefano Ricci (sr 1) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark sr 1 – Earlier national figurative marks SR – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9650

Case T-211/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Fractal Analytics v EUIPO – Fractalia Remote Systems (FRACTALIA Remote Systems) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA Remote Systems – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of evidence – Comparison of the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the mark)

cjeu_case ·
9651

Case T-201/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – CRA v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Iran – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Misuse of powers)

cjeu_case ·
9652

Case T-194/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Fractal Analytics v EUIPO – Fractalia Remote Systems (FRACTALIA) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark)

cjeu_case ·
9654

Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 16 octobre 2024.#Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis contre Agence exécutive du Conseil européen de la recherche.#Clause compromissoire – Septième programme-cadre pour des actions de recherche, de développement technologique et de démonstration (2007-2013) – Convention de subvention – Coûts éligibles – Frais de personnel – Enquête de l’OLAF – Charge de la preuve – Droit d’être entendu – Droit à un recours effectif.#Affaire T-388/22.

cjeu_case ·
9656

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Technological research and development – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Grant agreement – Action for annulment – Debit note – Letter rejecting declared costs as ineligible and ordering the recovery of a contribution paid to the guarantee fund – Acts not amenable to review – Acts forming part of a purely contractual framework from which they are inseparable – Inadmissibility – Reclassification of the action – Obligation to state reasons – Eligible costs – Proportionality.#Case T-654/20.

cjeu_case ·
9657

Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 16 octobre 2024.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) contre Agence exécutive pour le Conseil européen de l’innovation et les PME.#Clause compromissoire – Recherche et développement technologique – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” (2014-2020) – Convention de subvention – Recours en annulation – Note de débit – Lettre rejetant des coûts déclarés inéligibles et ordonnant la récupération d’une contribution versée au fonds de garantie – Actes non susceptibles de recours – Actes s’inscrivant dans un cadre purement contractuel dont ils sont indissociables – Irrecevabilité – Requalification du recours – Obligation de motivation – Coûts éligibles – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-654/20.

cjeu_case ·
9658

Case T-654/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Silex v Eismea (Arbitration clause – Technological research and development – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) – Grant agreement – Action for annulment – Debit note – Letter rejecting declared costs as ineligible and ordering the recovery of a contribution paid to the guarantee fund – Acts not amenable to review – Acts forming part of a purely contractual framework from which they are inseparable – Inadmissibility – Reclassification of the action – Obligation to state reasons – Eligible costs – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·