Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
9281

Case T-359/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO – Amigüitos pets & life (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9285

Case T-136/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – Grande Vitae (vintae) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94)

cjeu_case ·
9287

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

cjeu_case ·
9288

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

cjeu_case ·
9289

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ‘Failing or likely to fail’ assessment of Sberbank banka – Refusal to grant access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of the confidentiality of information that is protected as such under EU law – Concept of ‘confidential information’ – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests.#Case T-790/22.

cjeu_case ·
9290

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ‘Failing or likely to fail’ assessment of Sberbank banka – Refusal to grant access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of the confidentiality of information that is protected as such under EU law – Concept of ‘confidential information’ – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests.#Case T-790/22.

cjeu_case ·
9291

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Portumo - Madeira - Montagem e Manutenção de Tubaria, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering recovery of aid paid under it – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Freedom of movement for workers.#Cases T-713/22 and T-720/22.

cjeu_case ·
9292

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Portumo - Madeira - Montagem e Manutenção de Tubaria, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering recovery of aid paid under it – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Freedom of movement for workers.#Cases T-713/22 and T-720/22.

cjeu_case ·
9295

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ECB’s assessment that Sberbank banka was failing or likely to fail – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Admissibility – Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Supervised entity – Shareholders’ rights of defence – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right of access to the ECB’s file.#Case T-632/22.

cjeu_case ·
9296

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ECB’s assessment that Sberbank banka was failing or likely to fail – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Admissibility – Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Supervised entity – Shareholders’ rights of defence – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right of access to the ECB’s file.#Case T-632/22.

cjeu_case ·
9297

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#CFA Institute v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCA CHARTERED CONTROLLER ANALYST CERTIFICATE – Earlier EU word mark CFA and earlier EU figurative mark CFA CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – New decision taken following annulment in part of an earlier decision by the Court – Scope of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Res judicata.#Case T-561/22.

cjeu_case ·
9298

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#CFA Institute v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCA CHARTERED CONTROLLER ANALYST CERTIFICATE – Earlier EU word mark CFA and earlier EU figurative mark CFA CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – New decision taken following annulment in part of an earlier decision by the Court – Scope of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Res judicata.#Case T-561/22.

cjeu_case ·
9299

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of personal liability – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-520/22.

cjeu_case ·
9300

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of personal liability – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-520/22.

cjeu_case ·