Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
9263

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-359/23.

cjeu_case ·
9264

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-359/23.

cjeu_case ·
9269

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-136/23.

cjeu_case ·
9270

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-136/23.

cjeu_case ·
9271

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#House of Prince A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AROMA KING – Earlier national word mark KING’S – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – No independent distinctive role.#Case T-118/23.

cjeu_case ·
9272

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#House of Prince A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AROMA KING – Earlier national word mark KING’S – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – No independent distinctive role.#Case T-118/23.

cjeu_case ·
9276

Case T-544/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Puma v EUIPO – Zheng (Representation of an emblem) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing an emblem – Earlier EU figurative marks representing a stripe – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the signs – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9278

Case T-507/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – ZB v EUIPO – Muhsinoglu (X ENERGY DRINK) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ENERGY DRINK – Earlier EU figurative mark X Energy Drink – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9279

Case T-425/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Consejo Regulador Aceite de Jaén v EUIPO – Agrícola La Loma (VEGA DEL OBISPO BIO Jaén PRODUCTOS ECOLÓGICOS) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VEGA DEL OBISPO BIO Jaén PRODUCTOS ECOLOGICOS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 7(1)(f), (g) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of the evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·