9141Case T-1127/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Butzkies-Schiemann v EUIPO – U.S. Corrosion Technologies (CorrosionX) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CorrosionX – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Admissibility of the response filed before the Board of Appeal – Article 24(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9142Case T-1124/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Dyadema v EUIPO – Pegador (PEGADOR) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PEGADOR – Earlier EU word mark PECCATORE – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9143Case T-1050/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Markov v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/383/21 – Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Liability)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9144Case T-614/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Praha Alfa-Med v EUIPO – Rifetech (Apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis – Prior design – Obligation to state reasons – No individual character – No different overall impression – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Articles 4 to 6, Article 25(1)(b) and Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9145Case T-559/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Skins IP v EUIPO – Symphony (S SKINS) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark S SKINS – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9146Case T-545/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – G.M.P. Group v EUIPO – Audi (Vehicle wheel rims) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing vehicle wheel rims – Earlier design – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Overall impression – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9147Case T-524/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma v EUIPO – Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Europe (Shape of inhaler) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9148Case T-444/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – SC Certinvest v EUIPO – Kiddinx Studios (Tina) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Tina – Earlier EU figurative mark Bibi & Tina – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9149Case T-426/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Chiquita Brands v EUIPO – Compagnie financière de participation (Representation of a blue and yellow oval) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a blue and yellow oval – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9150Case T-221/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – WS v EUIPO (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD–Business Analyst – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure – Action for annulment – Rule of correspondence – Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Liability)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9151Case T-141/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Merlin and Others v Commission (Action for failure to act – State aid – Common fisheries policy – Funding for shipowners fishing with beam trawl using electrical pulse current – Complaint – Admissibility – Definition of a position by the Commission – Clear and definitive nature of the position adopted – Competence of the Commission – Obligation to act)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9152Case T-110/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Kargins v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents originating from a Member State – Documents relating to the Commission’s intervention in a dispute before the Supreme Court of Latvia – List of documents covered by the application for access to documents – Partial refusal of access – Objection by a Member State to disclosure of documents – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Presumption of legality attaching to EU measures – Review by the institution and by the EU Courts of the Member State’s grounds for objection – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Time limits provided for in Regulation No 1049/2001)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9153Case T-104/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – PAN Europe v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Preparatory documents of the Commission relating to a request for internal review of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 as regards the renewal of the approval of the active substance cypermethrin – Partial refusal to grant access – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9154Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Aesculap v EUIPO – Aeneas (AESKUCARE Food Intolerance, AESKUCARE and AESKUCARE Allergy) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for EU figurative marks AESKUCARE Food Intolerance and AESKUCARE Allergy and EU word mark AESKUCARE – Earlier EU and national word marks AESCULAP – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Cross-claims)cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9155Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Aboca SpA Soc. agr. and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-302/21.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9156Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Aboca SpA Soc. agr. and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-302/21.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9157Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Syndicat national des compléments alimentaires (Synadiet) and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-274/21.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9158Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Syndicat national des compléments alimentaires (Synadiet) and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-274/21.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9159Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Ortis v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First and second entries in Article 1(1), and first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Definition of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-271/21.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.
9160Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Ortis v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First and second entries in Article 1(1), and first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Definition of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-271/21.cjeu_case · 13 ноября 2024 г.