8581Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#Administradora Fortaleza Ltda and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – No derogation from the condition relating to the creation or maintenance of jobs in the Autonomous Region of Madeira – Principle of sound administration – Principle of sincere cooperation – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to property.#Case T-716/22.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8582Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#TA and Others v European Commission.#State Aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Freedom of establishment – Free movement of workers, citizens and capital – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to property.#Cases T-702/22, T-704/22, T-705/22 and T-710/22 to T-712/22.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8583Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#TA and Others v European Commission.#State Aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Freedom of establishment – Free movement of workers, citizens and capital – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to property.#Cases T-702/22, T-704/22, T-705/22 and T-710/22 to T-712/22.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8584Case T-787/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TT v Frontex (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Frontex staff – Appraisal report – 2021 appraisal exercise – Competence of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment – Right to be heard – No formal dialogue before the appraisal report was drawn up – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of impartiality – Misuse of powers)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8585Case T-776/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TP v Commission (Public procurement – Financial regulation – Exclusion for a period of two years from procurement and grant award procedures funded by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF – Significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations in the implementation of a prior contract – Article 136(1)(e) of the Financial Regulation – No automatic link between a finding of a failure to comply with contractual obligations by the court having jurisdiction over the contract and the adoption of an exclusion measure by the authorising officer responsible – Obligation to conduct a specific and individual assessment of the conduct of the person concerned – Prior contract awarded to a group of economic operators – Joint and several contractual liability)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8586Case T-732/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Deripaska v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of leading businessperson – Concept of businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(a) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection and rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to be heard)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8587Case T-716/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Administradora Fortaleza and Others v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of State aid – Concept of existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – No derogation from the condition relating to the creation or maintenance of jobs in the Autonomous Region of Madeira – Principle of sound administration – Principle of sincere cooperation – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to property)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8588Cases T-702/22, T-704/22, T-705/22 and T-710/22 to T-712/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TA and Others v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State Aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Freedom of establishment – Free movement of workers, citizens and capital – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to property)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8589Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 18 décembre 2024.#TB contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la cybersécurité.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Recrutement – Avis de vacance – Rejet de candidature – Recours en annulation – Représentation d’une institution par un de ses agents – Intérêt à agir – Recevabilité – Obligation de motivation – Principe de bonne administration – Responsabilité – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-560/21.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8590Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#TB v European Union Agency for Cybersecurity.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Action for annulment – Representation of an institution by one of its agents – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-560/21.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8591Case T-560/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TB v ENISA (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Action for annulment – Representation of an institution by one of its agents – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Liability – Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2024
8593Case C-873/24, Marwanak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 17 December 2024 – GK and Otherscjeu_case · 17 décembre 2024
8594Case C-870/24, Outletico: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 17 December 2024 – Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA OUTLETICOcjeu_case · 17 décembre 2024
8595Case T-651/24: Action brought on 16 December 2024 – Eti v EUIPO – Dr. Oetker RO (Poof!...and done)cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2024
8596Case T-650/24: Action brought on 16 December 2024 – TotalEnergies Charging Services España v CINEAcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2024
8597Case C-909/24, Investcapital and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arad (Romania) lodged on 16 December 2024 – InvestCapital Ltd v PNcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2024
8598Case C-874/24: Action brought on 16 December 2024 – European Commission v Kingdom of Spaincjeu_case · 16 décembre 2024
8599Case C-872/24, Digi România and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arad (Romania) lodged on 16 December 2024 – Digi România SA v VKcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2024
8600Case C-871/24 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2024 by Przedsiębiorstwo produkcyjno – usługowo – handlowe Jopp – Pol Eksport – Import Ryszard Jopp – Krzysztof Jopp sp. j. against the judgment delivered on 9 October 2024 in Case T-554/23, Jopp – Pol Eksport – Import Ryszard Jopp – Krzysztof Jopp v EUIPOcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2024