Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
8381

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Commune de Schaerbeek and Commune de Linkebeek v Holding Communal SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/71/EC – Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading – Article 2(1)(a) – Concept of ‘securities’ – Article 3 – Obligation to publish a prospectus – Securities negotiable on the capital market – Shares in a holding company that may be held only by certain territorial administrative authorities of a Member State – Transfer of shares requiring the approval of the board of directors of the holding company.#Case C-627/23.

cjeu_case ·
8382

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Commune de Schaerbeek and Commune de Linkebeek v Holding Communal SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/71/EC – Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading – Article 2(1)(a) – Concept of ‘securities’ – Article 3 – Obligation to publish a prospectus – Securities negotiable on the capital market – Shares in a holding company that may be held only by certain territorial administrative authorities of a Member State – Transfer of shares requiring the approval of the board of directors of the holding company.#Case C-627/23.

cjeu_case ·
8383

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#AK v Ministère public.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Service of an indictment accompanied by an order that the person be remanded in custody pending trial and make a bail payment – Hearing of the accused person.#Case C-583/23.

cjeu_case ·
8384

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#AK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Service of an indictment accompanied by an order that the person be remanded in custody pending trial and make a bail payment – Hearing of the accused person.#Case C-583/23.

cjeu_case ·
8385

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 31(1)(b) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Conditions – Technical reasons – Reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights – Attributable to the contracting authority – Factual and legal circumstances to be taken into consideration.#Case C-578/23.

cjeu_case ·
8386

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 31(1)(b) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Conditions – Technical reasons – Reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights – Attributable to the contracting authority – Factual and legal circumstances to be taken into consideration.#Case C-578/23.

cjeu_case ·
8387

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v F R and Bundesministerin für Justiz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(f) and Article 57(4) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Concepts of a ‘request’ and ‘excessive requests’ – Charging of a reasonable fee or refusal to act on requests in the event of manifestly unfounded or excessive requests – Criteria which may guide the supervisory authority in making its choice – Article 77(1) – Concept of a ‘complaint’.#Case C-416/23.

cjeu_case ·
8388

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v F R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(f) and Article 57(4) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Concepts of a ‘request’ and ‘excessive requests’ – Charging of a reasonable fee or refusal to act on requests in the event of manifestly unfounded or excessive requests – Criteria which may guide the supervisory authority in making its choice – Article 77(1) – Concept of a ‘complaint’.#Case C-416/23.

cjeu_case ·
8389

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Association Mousse v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and SNCF Connect.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(c) – Data minimisation – Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing – Data relating to title and gender identity – Online sale of travel documents – Article 21 – Right to object.#Case C-394/23.

cjeu_case ·
8390

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 January 2025.#Mousse v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and SNCF Connect.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'état (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(c) – Data minimisation – Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing – Data relating to title and gender identity – Online sale of travel documents – Article 21 – Right to object.#Case C-394/23.

cjeu_case ·
8391

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 9 January 2025.#IL v Veracash SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Article 56(1)(b) – Obligation for the payment service user to notify the payment service provider ‘without undue delay’ of the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of his or her payment instrument – Article 58 – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Rectification of such a transaction by the payment service provider subject to the obligation for the user of those services to notify that transaction ‘without undue delay … and no later than 13 months after the debit date’ – Articles 60 and 61 – Respective liabilities of the payment service provider and of the payer for unauthorised payment transactions – Successive unauthorised payment transactions resulting from the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of a payment instrument – Delayed notification without intent or gross negligence – Scope of the right to a refund.#Case C-665/23.

cjeu_case ·
8392

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 9 January 2025.#Beevers Kaas BV v Albert Heijn België NV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Vertical agreements – Article 101(3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Block exemption – Article 4(b)(i) – Hardcore restriction that removes the benefit of that exemption – Exception – Exclusive distribution agreements – Restriction of active sales in an exclusive territory – Concept of ‘agreement’ – Concurrence of wills between the supplier and its buyers – Proof – Exclusive territory allocated to a buyer – Absence of active sales by other buyers in that territory.#Case C-581/23.

cjeu_case ·
8393

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 9 January 2025.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance – Article 11(1)(b) – Article 13(2) – Action brought by an injured party directly against an insurer – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Official injured in a road traffic accident – Continued remuneration during that official’s incapacity to work – Member State acting as the employer subrogated to that official’s rights to compensation – Jurisdiction of the courts for the place where the claimant is domiciled – Place where the administrative body employing that official has its seat.#Case C-536/23.

cjeu_case ·
8394

Case C-627/23, Commune de Schaerbeek and Commune de Linkebeek: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – Belgium) – Commune de Schaerbeek, Commune de Linkebeek v Holding Communal SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/71/EC – Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading – Article 2(1)(a) – Concept of securities – Article 3 – Obligation to publish a prospectus – Securities negotiable on the capital market – Shares in a holding company that may be held only by certain territorial administrative authorities of a Member State – Transfer of shares requiring the approval of the board of directors of the holding company)

cjeu_case ·
8395

Case C-583/23, Delda: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – in the proceedings on the recognition and execution of a European Investigation Order concerning AK (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Material scope – Concept of investigative measure – Service of an indictment accompanied by an order that the person be remanded in custody pending trial and make a bail payment – Hearing of the accused person)

cjeu_case ·
8396

Case C-578/23, Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 31(1)(b) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Conditions – Technical reasons – Reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights – Attributable to the contracting authority – Factual and legal circumstances to be taken into consideration)

cjeu_case ·
8397

Case C-416/23, Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde (Excessive requests: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v F R (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(f) and Article 57(4) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Concepts of a request and excessive requests – Charging of a reasonable fee or refusal to act on requests in the event of manifestly unfounded or excessive requests – Criteria which may guide the supervisory authority in making its choice – Article 77(1) – Concept of a complaint)

cjeu_case ·
8398

Case C-394/23, Mousse: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État – France) – Mousse v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), SNCF Connect (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(c) – Data minimisation – Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing – Data relating to title and gender identity – Online sale of travel documents – Article 21 – Right to object)

cjeu_case ·