783Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Ghada Mhana contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-637/24 P.cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
784Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Sara Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-636/24 P.cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
785Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Kinda Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-635/24 P.cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
787Case C-637/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 May 2026 – Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Family membership criterion)cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
788Case C-636/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 May 2026 – Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Family membership criterion)cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
789Case C-635/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 May 2026 – Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Family membership criterion)cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
790Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22.cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
791Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bergamo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22.cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
792Case C-747/22, INPS (Social assistance and access to employment – Indirect discrimination): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bergamo – Italy) – KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination)cjeu_case · May 6, 2026
794Case T-281/26: Action brought on 6 May 2026 – Olympic Casino Group Baltija v EUIPO – Comité International Olympique (THE OLYMPICS)cjeu_case · May 5, 2026
795Case T-280/26: Action brought on 6 May 2026 – Broadcom and VMware International v Commissioncjeu_case · May 5, 2026
796Case C-450/26, UNAA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 6 May 2026 – Unione Nazionale Avvocati Amministrativisti (UNAA) v Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC)cjeu_case · May 5, 2026
797Case C-449/26, Freie Hansestadt Bremen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgerichts der Freien Hansestadt Bremen (Germany) lodged on 6 May 2026 – UQ v Freie Hansestadt Bremencjeu_case · May 5, 2026
798Case C-448/26, Rayonen sad – Tutrakan: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Razgrad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 May 2026 – Rayonen sad – Tutrakan v O.K.M.cjeu_case · May 5, 2026
799Case C-446/26, Blerens: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 6 May 2026 – European arrest warrant issued against RI; other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministeriecjeu_case · May 5, 2026
800Case C-445/26, Spirink: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond (Netherlands) lodged on 6 May 2026 – HL and RN, also on behalf of their children v Minister van Asiel en Migratiecjeu_case · May 5, 2026