Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
7624

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol and Pannonia Bio Zrt. v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Energy – Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 – Provision stating that biofuels produced from food and feed crops are to be considered to have the same emission factors as the least favourable fossil fuel pathway for that type of fuel – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-1165/23.

cjeu_case ·
7625

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol and Pannonia Bio Zrt. v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Energy – Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 – Provision stating that biofuels produced from food and feed crops are to be considered to have the same emission factors as the least favourable fossil fuel pathway for that type of fuel – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-1165/23.

cjeu_case ·
7627

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#Nutmark, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Piamark, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market.#Joined Cases C-804/23 P and C-805/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
7628

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#Nutmark Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Piamark Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market.#Joined Cases C-804/23 P and C-805/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
7629

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#Alphabet Inc. and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Dominant position – Article 102 TFEU – Digital markets – Digital platform – Refusal of an undertaking in a dominant position which has developed a digital platform to allow access to that platform by a third-party undertaking which has developed an app, by ensuring that platform is interoperable with that app – Assessment of whether access to a digital platform is indispensable – Effects of the conduct at issue – Objective justification – Need for the undertaking in a dominant position to develop a template for a category of apps in order to allow access – Definition of the relevant downstream market.#Case C-233/23.

cjeu_case ·
7630

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#Alphabet Inc. and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Dominant position – Article 102 TFEU – Digital markets – Digital platform – Refusal of an undertaking in a dominant position which has developed a digital platform to allow access to that platform by a third-party undertaking which has developed an app, by ensuring that platform is interoperable with that app – Assessment of whether access to a digital platform is indispensable – Effects of the conduct at issue – Objective justification – Need for the undertaking in a dominant position to develop a template for a category of apps in order to allow access – Definition of the relevant downstream market.#Case C-233/23.

cjeu_case ·
7631

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#XL and Others v Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku and Lietuvos Respublika.#References for a preliminary ruling – Freezing or reduction of remuneration in the national public administration – Measures specifically aimed at judges – Article 2 TEU – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Possibility of derogating from those rules – Conditions.#Joined Cases C-146/23 and C-374/23.

cjeu_case ·
7632

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#XL and Others v Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku and Lietuvos Respublika.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku and Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#References for a preliminary ruling – Freezing or reduction of remuneration in the national public administration – Measures specifically aimed at judges – Article 2 TEU – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Possibility of derogating from those rules – Conditions.#Joined Cases C-146/23 and C-374/23.

cjeu_case ·
7633

Joined Cases C-804/23 P and C-805/23 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2025 – Nutmark and Piamark v Commission (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market)

cjeu_case ·
7634

Case C-233/23, Alphabet and Others: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Alphabet Inc. and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Dominant position – Article 102 TFEU – Digital markets – Digital platform – Refusal of an undertaking in a dominant position which has developed a digital platform to allow access to that platform by a third-party undertaking which has developed an app, by ensuring that platform is interoperable with that app – Assessment of whether access to a digital platform is indispensable – Effects of the conduct at issue – Objective justification – Need for the undertaking in a dominant position to develop a template for a category of apps in order to allow access – Definition of the relevant downstream market)

cjeu_case ·
7635

Joined Cases C-146/23 and C-374/23, Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku and Adoreikė: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku, Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas – Poland and Lithuania) – XL and Others v Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku, Lietuvos Respublika (References for a preliminary ruling – Freezing or reduction of remuneration in the national public administration – Measures specifically aimed at judges – Article 2 TEU – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Possibility of derogating from those rules – Conditions)

cjeu_case ·
7636

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 4(1) – General jurisdiction – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction over the registration or validity of patents – Infringement action – European patent validated in Member States and in a third State – Challenge to the validity of the patent raised as a defence – International jurisdiction of the court hearing the infringement action.#Case C-339/22.

cjeu_case ·
7637

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 4(1) – General jurisdiction – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents – Infringement action – European patent validated in Member States and in a third State – Challenge to the validity of the patent raised as a defence – International jurisdiction of the court hearing the infringement action.#Case C-339/22.

cjeu_case ·
7638

Case C-339/22, BSH Hausgeräte: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen – Sweden) – BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 4(1) – General jurisdiction – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents – Infringement action – European patent validated in Member States and in a third State – Challenge to the validity of the patent raised as a defence – International jurisdiction of the court hearing the infringement action)

cjeu_case ·