7301Case T-153/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Danube CCS Ventures v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 mars 2025
7303Case C-189/25, Virus II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 7 March 2025 – Umweltorganisation VIRUS – Verein Projektwerkstatt für Umwelt und Soziales and Others v Autobahnen- und Schnellstraßen-Finanzierungs-AG (Asfinag)cjeu_case · 7 mars 2025
7304Case C-187/25, EVN Bulgaria Renewables: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Plovdiv (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 March 2025 – EVN Bulgaria Renewables EOOD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia Plovdiv na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihoditecjeu_case · 7 mars 2025
7305Case C-186/25, Institut po ribni resursi Varna: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 March 2025 – Institut po ribni resursi Varna v Rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Savmestna operativna programa za transgranichno satrudnichestvo Chernomorski basein 2014-2020 i direktor na direktsia Upravlenie na teritorialnoto satrudnichestvocjeu_case · 7 mars 2025
7306Case C-185/25, Waldfelber: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obersten Gerichtshofs (Austria) lodged on 7 March 2025 – RS v TScjeu_case · 7 mars 2025
7307Case C-184/25, Mercedes-Benz Group: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Duisburg (Germany) lodged on 7 March 2025 – RH v Mercedes-Benz Group AGcjeu_case · 7 mars 2025
7308Case C-182/25, Volkswagen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 6 March 2025 – TS v Volkswagen AGcjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7309Order of the Court of 6 March 2025.#Dekoback GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-775/24 P.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7310Order of the Court of 6 March 2025.#Dekoback GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-775/24 P.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7311Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Waltham Abbey Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) – Projects covered by Annex II – Urban development projects – Article 4(4) and (5) – Obligations of the developer and the competent authority when the Member State concerned decides to require the determination provided for in those paragraphs 4 and 5 for those projects – Account taken of observations submitted by a third party, indicating a potential impact of the project concerned on an animal species covered by the strict protection provided for in Article 12 of Directive 92/43/EEC.#Case C-41/24.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7312Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Waltham Abbey Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irelande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) – Projects covered by Annex II – Urban development projects – Article 4(4) and (5) – Obligations of the developer and the competent authority when the Member State concerned decides to require the determination provided for in those paragraphs 4 and 5 for those projects – Account taken of observations submitted by a third party, indicating a potential impact of the project concerned on an animal species covered by the strict protection provided for in Article 12 of Directive 92/43/EEC.#Case C-41/24.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7313Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of proving payment.#Case C-20/24.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7314Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of proving payment.#Case C-20/24.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7315Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 6 March 2025.#LEGO A/S v Pozitív Energiaforrás Kft.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Community design – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 8(3) – Design allowing the multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Scope of the protection conferred by such a design – Article 10 – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Article 89(1) – Sanctions in actions for infringement – Special reasons allowing the national court not to make the orders provided for in that provision – Infringement in respect of the pieces of a toy building set, the number of which is small in relation to total number of components of that set.#Case C-211/24.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7316Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 6 March 2025.#YX and Logistica i Gestió Caves Andorranes i Vidal SA v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance and Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 – Customs duties collected in infringement of EU law – Third subparagraph of Article 2(2) – Conditions for repayment on their own initiative – Finding that those duties were wrongly collected before the expiry of a period of three years from the date on which they were entered in the accounts – Finding that the national customs authorities are aware of the identity of the operators concerned and of the amount to be repaid to each of them – Obligation on those authorities to take the necessary and appropriate measures to obtain the information necessary to make such repayment.#Case C-206/24.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7317Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 March 2025.#AA v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – VAT exemption – Article 143(1)(e) – Reimportation of goods – Condition relating to exemption from customs duty on the importation of returned goods – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 86(6) and Article 203 – Incurrence of a customs debt as a result of failure to comply with a formal obligation laid down in the customs legislation – Cases where such a debt is incurred.#Case C-125/24.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7318Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 6 March 2025.#BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 69(1) – Article 70(1) – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Article 7(1) to (3) – Sums paid as collateral backing irrevocable payment commitments – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) refusing to return the sums paid.#Case C-4/24 P.cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7319Case C-41/24, Waltham Abbey Residents Association: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court – Ireland) – Waltham Abbey Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála, Ireland, The Attorney General (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) – Projects covered by Annex II – Urban development projects – Article 4(4) and (5) – Obligations of the developer and the competent authority when the Member State concerned decides to require the determination provided for in those paragraphs 4 and 5 for those projects – Account taken of observations submitted by a third party, indicating a potential impact of the project concerned on an animal species covered by the strict protection provided for in Article 12 of Directive 92/43/EEC)cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025
7320Case C-20/24, Cymdek: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy w Warszawie – Poland) – M1.R., M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of providing payment)cjeu_case · 6 mars 2025