Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
6141

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-374/24.

cjeu_case ·
6143

Case T-374/24: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Comeig Ramírez (R+ CASHLAB) (Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
6147

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2025.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment and for failure to act – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Act not open to challenge – Incorrect designation of the defendant – Statement of position – End of the failure to act – Partial inadmissibility – Application of a declaratory nature – Application for directions to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-261/24.

cjeu_case ·
6148

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2025.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment and for failure to act – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Act not open to challenge – Incorrect designation of the defendant – Statement of position – End of the failure to act – Partial inadmissibility – Application of a declaratory nature – Application for directions to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-261/24.

cjeu_case ·