Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
6062

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 22 May 2025.#Ministère public v KN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Montpellier.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 67(3) and Article 82(1) TFEU – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Extradition request from a third country – EU citizen – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Previous decision of another Member State refusing extradition due to a serious risk of infringement of fundamental rights – Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the requested person not to be extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Mutual trust – Obligation to take account of the grounds on which the previous decision refusing extradition was based – No obligation of mutual recognition of that decision.#Case C-219/25 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
6065

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the Union – Articles 3d and 12 of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Act not amenable to review – Inadmissibility.#Case T-213/24.

cjeu_case ·
6066

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the Union – Articles 3d and 12 of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Act not amenable to review – Inadmissibility.#Case T-213/24.

cjeu_case ·
6068

Case T-213/24: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2025 – Cortex v Commission (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the Union – Articles 3d and 12 of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Act not amenable to review – Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
6070

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 22 May 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL and Different Media SRL v Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași and Ministerul Antreprenoriatului şi Turismului - Agenţia pentru Întreprinderi Mici și Mijlocii, Atragere de Investiţii şi Promovare a Exportului Iaşi.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Exemption for certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market – Translation error in the Romanian language version of that regulation – Legal effects of the regulation correcting that error – Possibility of recovering aid that was granted before the correction in compliance with the conditions set out in the version of the regulation containing the translation error – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-416/24 and C-417/24.

cjeu_case ·
6071

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 22 May 2025.#BC v S. C. P. Attal et Associés.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63(1) TFEU – Succession – Mandatory use of a notary for the purpose of drawing up a declaration of succession in a Member State other than that in which the succession was opened – Legislation of that Member State providing that that notary’s fees are calculated on the basis of the total gross assets of the estate – Parallel exercise by the Member States of their powers of taxation – No restriction on the free movement of capital.#Case C-321/24.

cjeu_case ·
6072

Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 22 May 2025.#AY v Liechtensteinische Landesbank (Österreich) AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Article 3(1) and (2) – Choice of the applicable law – Article 6 – Scope – Contract concluded between a professional and a consumer residing in another Member State – Activity of the professional directed to the Member State in which the consumer has his or her habitual residence after the date of conclusion of the contract containing a choice-of-law clause.#Case C-279/24.

cjeu_case ·
6073

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 22 May 2025.#Brose Prievidza spol. s r. o. v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' - Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 138(1) – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 4(b) – Refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Principal supply and ancillary supply – Artificial splitting of a single supply – No dispatch of the object of the supply.#Case C-234/24.

cjeu_case ·
6074

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 22 May 2025.#Naturvårdsverket v UQ and IC.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Mark- och miljööverdomstolen.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Article 24(2) – Shipment – Take-back when a shipment is illegal – Take-back of the waste by the competent authority of dispatch – Obligation or possibility for that authority to recover or dispose of the waste despite opposition by the initial dispatcher – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Validity.#Joined Cases C-221/24 and C-222/24.

cjeu_case ·
6075

Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 22 May 2025.#JYSK Kereskedelmi Kft. v Nemzeti Élelmiszerlánc-biztonsági Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Obligations of operators placing timber and timber products on the market – Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 – Use, maintenance and regular evaluation of a due diligence system – Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 6 – Group of companies – Access of an operator to a due diligence system maintained and evaluated by its parent company or established by a monitoring organisation and used by that parent company.#Case C-117/24.

cjeu_case ·
6077

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union – Free allocation of allowances – Article 10a(1) – Concept of ‘substitutes’ – National implementing measures – Article 11(1) – Lists of installations covered by Directive 2003/87 submitted to the European Commission by the Member States – Decision (EU) 2021/355 – Proposal of the Member State concerned to cover by a benchmark for sintered ore a sub-installation producing iron ore pellets – Rejection decision – Establishment of benchmarks by the Commission – General objective of incentivising the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – No obligation of result – Article 296 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons for decisions of the EU institutions.#Case C-621/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
6078

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union – Free allocation of allowances – Article 10a(1) – Concept of ‘substitutes’ – National implementing measures – Article 11(1) – Lists of installations covered by Directive 2003/87 submitted to the European Commission by the Member States – Decision (EU) 2021/355 – Proposal of the Member State concerned to cover by a benchmark for sintered ore a sub-installation producing iron ore pellets – Rejection decision – Establishment of benchmarks by the Commission – General objective of incentivising the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – No obligation of result – Article 296 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons for decisions of the EU institutions.#Case C-621/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
6079

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG and WESTbahn Management GmbH v Schienen-Control Kommission.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure – Establishing, determining and collecting charges – Article 29 – Exceptions to charging principles – Article 32 – Mark-ups – Modalities for calculation and publication – Article 56 – Functions of the regulatory body – Authorisation procedure for mark-ups, provided for by national law – Conditions.#Case C-538/23.

cjeu_case ·
6080

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG and WESTbahn Management GmbH v Schienen-Control Kommission.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure – Establishing, determining and collecting charges – Article 29 – Exceptions to charging principles – Article 32 – Mark-ups – Modalities for calculation and publication – Article 56 – Functions of the regulatory body – Authorisation procedure for mark-ups, provided for by national law – Conditions.#Case C-538/23.

cjeu_case ·