6041Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2025.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Taxation of costs – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-663/19 DEP.cjeu_case · 26 мая 2025 г.
6042Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2025.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Taxation of costs – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-663/19 DEP.cjeu_case · 26 мая 2025 г.
6043Order of the President of the General Court of 23 May 2025.#Hungary v European Commission and European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Interim relief – Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Grant agreement – ‘Connecting Core Network elements in the transport sector: Rhine-Danube corridor – Komárom-Komárno cross-border bridge’ project – Debit note – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-110/25 R.cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6044Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 23 mai 2025.#Hongrie contre Commission européenne et Agence exécutive européenne pour le climat, les infrastructures et l’environnement.#Référé – Mécanisme pour l’interconnexion en Europe (MIE) – Convention de subvention – Projet “Connexion des éléments du réseau central dans le secteur des transports : Corridor Rhin-Danube – Pont transfrontalier Komárom-Komárno” – Note de débit – Demande de sursis à exécution – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-110/25 R.cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6047Case T-110/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 May 2025 – Hungary v Commission and CINEA (Interim relief – Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Grant agreement – Connecting Core Network elements in the transport sector: Rhine-Danube corridor – Komárom-Komárno cross-border bridge project – Debit note – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6048Case C-320/25 P: Appeal brought on 23 May 2025 by the Kingdom of Sweden against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 March 2025 in Case T-485/22, Kingdom of Sweden v European Commissioncjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6049Case C-349/25, Banka DSK and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 23 May 2025 – Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD, Banka DSK AD, EOS Matrix EOODcjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6050Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2025.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Recommendation of EIOPA on actions to be taken to comply with EU law – Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-204/24.cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6051Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2025.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Recommendation of EIOPA on actions to be taken to comply with EU law – Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-204/24.cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6052Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2025.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Formal opinion of the Commission on actions necessary to comply with EU law – Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Actionable measure – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-179/24.cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6053Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2025.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Formal opinion of the Commission on actions necessary to comply with EU law – Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Actionable measure – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-179/24.cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6054Case T-204/24: Order of the General Court of 23 May 2025 – Novis v EIOPA (Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Recommendation of EIOPA on actions to be taken to comply with EU law – Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6055Case T-179/24: Order of the General Court of 23 May 2025 – Novis v Commission (Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Formal opinion of the Commission on actions necessary to comply with EU law – Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Actionable measure – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 23 мая 2025 г.
6057Order of the Court of 22 May 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/25 P.cjeu_case · 22 мая 2025 г.
6058Order of the Court of 22 May 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/25 P.cjeu_case · 22 мая 2025 г.
6059Case C-348/25 P: Appeal brought on 22 May 2025 by PGI Spain, SL, Berry Superfos Pamplona, SA, Promens Packaging, SA, RPC Envases, SA and Zeller Plastik España, SL against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12/03/2025 in Case T-596/22, PGI Spain and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 22 мая 2025 г.
6060Case C-347/25, Zapp: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 22 May 2025 – Zapp Precision Metals GmbH, Zapp AG v KUcjeu_case · 22 мая 2025 г.