5881Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów i Kanalizacji w m.st. Warszawie S.A. v Veolia Water Technologies sp. z o.o. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC – Principle of equal treatment – Obligation of transparency – Public works contract – Applicability by analogy to a public works contract, pursuant to a judicial interpretation, of rules on guarantees in respect of contracts for sale.#Case C-82/24.cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5882Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów i Kanalizacji w m.st. Warszawie S.A. v Veolia Water Technologies sp. z o.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC – Principle of equal treatment – Obligation of transparency – Public works contract – Applicability by analogy to a public works contract, pursuant to a judicial interpretation, of rules on guarantees in respect of contracts for sale.#Case C-82/24.cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5883Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 5 June 2025.#Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union – Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock – Concept of aid – Concept of undertaking – Economic activity – Existing or new aid.#Case C-401/24.cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5884Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 5 June 2025.###cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5886Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 5 June 2025.#Ministério Público v YX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto - Juízo Local Criminal de Vila Nova de Gaia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Objective of social rehabilitation – Residence of the convicted person – Enforcement of that sentence by the executing State in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Suspension of the enforcement of a custodial sentence ordered by a court of the executing Member State – Article 8 – Obligation, for the executing State, to recognise the judgment and enforce the sentence – Article 17 – Option, for the executing State, to determine the procedures for enforcement.#Case C-215/24.cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5890Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 5 June 2025.#NOVIS Insurance Company, NOVIS Versicherungsgesellschaft, NOVIS Compagnia di Assicurazioni, NOVIS Poisťovňa a.s. v Česká národní banka.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services – Single insurance market – Directive 2009/138/EC – Principle of supervision by the home Member State – Article 155 – Competencies of the supervisory authorities of the host Member State – Cooperation with the authorities of the home Member State – Insurance undertaking not complying with the legal provisions applicable in the host Member State – Provisions concerned – Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 – Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) – Directive (EU) 2016/97 – Insurance distribution – Powers of the supervisory authorities of the host Member State to penalise the undertaking concerned – Scope.#Case C-18/24.cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5891Case C-543/24: Judgment of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 5 June 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 4(3)(a) – Commercial transactions between undertakings and public authorities – Obligation for Member States to ensure that public authorities comply with the periods for payment laid down in that provision – Article 6(1) – Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor in the event of late payment by the debtor – Payment of a fixed sum)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5892Case C-541/24, Naltov: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – SQ (Reference for a preliminary ruling – No dispute – No proceedings intended to lead to a decision of a judicial nature – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5893Case C-359/24: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025 – European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Framework for EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Article 13(7) and Article 15(1) – River basin management plans – Second review and second update – Directive 2007/60/EC – Article 14(3) and Article 15(1) – Flood risk management plans – First review and, where applicable, first update – No obligation to notify the European Commission)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5894Case C-349/24, Nuratau: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně – Czech Republic) – A.B. v Ministerstvo vnitra, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 3 – More favourable standards – Subsidiary protection – Reason that has no direct link with the situation in the country of origin – Rationale of international protection)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5895Case C-310/24, Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – YL v Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad EAD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EU – Scope – Unsolicited supply)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5896Case C-292/24, Iberia (Anticipatory complaint): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main – Germany) – AD v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España SA Operadora Unipersonal (Reference for a preliminary ruling – International air transport – Montreal Convention – Air carrier liability – Article 19 – Damage occasioned by delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage or cargo – Article 31(2) – Timely notice of complaints – Complaint before the date on which the baggage concerned was placed at the disposal of the person entitled to delivery of it)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5897Case C-280/24, Malicník: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia)) – A.B. v Slovenská sporiteľňa a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Assessment of whether a term which has not been individually negotiated is unfair – Article 3(1) and Article 4(1) – Consumer credit agreement – Arrangement fee clause – Requirement of transparency – Article 4(2) and Article 5 – Clause not specifying the substance of the services supplied in exchange for that fee – Whether defining the fee borne by the consumer and indicating the specific amount of that fee is sufficient – Passing on to the consumer of all of the costs of the activities associated with the arrangement fee)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5898Case C-82/24, Veolia Water Technologies and Others: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów i Kanalizacji w m.st. Warszawie S.A. v Veolia Water Technologies sp. z o.o., Krüger A/S, OTV France, Haarslev Industries GmbH, Warbud S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC – Principle of equal treatment – Obligation of transparency – Public works contract – Applicability by analogy to a public works contract, pursuant to a judicial interpretation, of rules on guarantees in respect of contracts for sale)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5899Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#RL and Others v Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment of severance pay to judges and prosecutors upon retirement – Suspension and cancellation of that payment for reasons connected to the need to eliminate a budget deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislature and executive of Member States to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions.#Case C-762/23.cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.
5900Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#RL and Others v Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment of severance pay to judges and prosecutors upon retirement – Suspension and cancellation of that payment for reasons connected to the need to eliminate a budget deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislature and executive of Member States to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions.#Case C-762/23.cjeu_case · 5 июня 2025 г.