Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
5865

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Tertianum Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement.#Case C-800/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
5866

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Tertianum Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement.#Case C-800/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
5867

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 4(3)(a) – Commercial transactions between undertakings and public authorities – Obligation for Member States to ensure that public authorities comply with the periods for payment laid down in that provision – Article 6(1) – Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor in the event of late payment by the debtor – Payment of a fixed sum.#Case C-543/24.

cjeu_case ·
5868

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 4(3)(a) – Commercial transactions between undertakings and public authorities – Obligation for Member States to ensure that public authorities comply with the periods for payment laid down in that provision – Article 6(1) – Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor in the event of late payment by the debtor – Payment of a fixed sum.#Case C-543/24.

cjeu_case ·
5871

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Framework for EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Article 13(7) and Article 15(1) – River basin management plans – Second review and second update – Directive 2007/60/EC – Article 14(3) and Article 15(1) – Flood risk management plans – First review and, where applicable, first update – No obligation to notify the European Commission.#Case C-359/24.

cjeu_case ·
5872

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Framework for EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Article 13(7) and Article 15(1) – River basin management plans – Second review and second update – Directive 2007/60/EC – Article 14(3) and Article 15(1) – Flood risk management plans – First review and, where applicable, first update – No obligation to notify the European Commission.#Case C-359/24.

cjeu_case ·
5873

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#A.B. v Ministerstvo vnitra, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 3 – More favourable standards – Subsidiary protection – Reason that has no direct link with the situation in the country of origin – Rationale of international protection.#Case C-349/24.

cjeu_case ·
5874

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#A.B. v Ministerstvo vnitra, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 3 – More favourable standards – Subsidiary protection – Reason that has no direct link with the situation in the country of origin – Rationale of international protection.#Case C-349/24.

cjeu_case ·
5875

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v ‘Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad’ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive (EU) 2011/83 – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.

cjeu_case ·
5876

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v ‘Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad’ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive (EU) 2011/83 – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.

cjeu_case ·
5877

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#AD v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España SA Operadora Unipersonal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – International air transport – Montreal Convention – Air carrier liability – Article 19 – Damage occasioned by delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage or cargo – Article 31(2) – Timely notice of complaints – Complaint before the date on which the baggage concerned was placed at the disposal of the person entitled to delivery of it.#Case C-292/24.

cjeu_case ·
5878

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#AD v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España SA Operadora Unipersonal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – International air transport – Montreal Convention – Air carrier liability – Article 19 – Damage occasioned by delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage or cargo – Article 31(2) – Timely notice of complaints – Complaint before the date on which the baggage concerned was placed at the disposal of the person entitled to delivery of it.#Case C-292/24.

cjeu_case ·
5879

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#A. B. v Slovenská sporiteľňa, a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Assessment of whether a term which has not been individually negotiated is unfair – Article 3(1) and Article 4(1) – Consumer credit agreement – ‘Arrangement fee’ clause – Requirement of transparency – Article 4(2) and Article 5 – Clause not specifying the substance of the services supplied in exchange for that fee – Whether defining the fee borne by the consumer and indicating the specific amount of that fee is sufficient – Passing on to the consumer of all of the costs of the activities associated with the arrangement fee.#Case C-280/24.

cjeu_case ·
5880

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#A. B. v Slovenská sporiteľňa a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Assessment of whether a term which has not been individually negotiated is unfair – Article 3(1) and Article 4(1) – Consumer credit agreement – ‘Arrangement fee’ clause – Requirement of transparency – Article 4(2) and Article 5 – Clause not specifying the substance of the services supplied in exchange for that fee – Whether defining the fee borne by the consumer and indicating the specific amount of that fee is sufficient – Passing on to the consumer of all of the costs of the activities associated with the arrangement fee.#Case C-280/24.

cjeu_case ·