5343Case T-435/25: Action brought on 4 July 2025 – Meta Platforms v Commissioncjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5344Case C-498/25, Abelardo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 1 de Córdoba (Spain) lodged on 4 July 2025 – Abelardo v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributariacjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5345Case C-442/25, SAS: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 4 July 2025 – SAS AB v Staten genom Justitiekanslerncjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5346Case C-441/25, Agecop: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 4 July 2025 – AGECOP – Associação para a Gestão da Cópia Privada v VISAPRESS – Gestão de Conteúdos dos Media, CRLcjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5347Case C-440/25, Erbil: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Zwolle (Netherlands) lodged on 4 July 2025 – PM and Others v Minister van Asiel en Migratiecjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5348Case C-438/25, Volkswagen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Deutschlandsberg (Austria) lodged on 4 July 2025 – YK v Volkswagen AGcjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5349Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2025.#Clara Di Prinzio v European Parliament.#Case T-375/23 REC.cjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5350Case T-233/23: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2025 – Gutseriev v Councilcjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5351Joined Case T-739/21 and T-69/22: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2025 – Eurecna v Commission (Action for annulment – Public procurement – Performance of a contract financed under the EDF – Formal notice to pay – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Recovery by offsetting – Partial payment of the debt pending proceedings – Amount paid exceeding the amount in dispute – No longer any interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 4 июля 2025 г.
5353Case T-429/25: Action brought on 3 July 2025 – Dogru and AFA Medya v Councilcjeu_case · 3 июля 2025 г.
5356Case C-437/25, Avtomobilna administratsia Gabrovo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Gabrovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 3 July 2025 – FT v Nachalnik Oblasten otdel Avtomobilna administratsia Gabrovocjeu_case · 3 июля 2025 г.
5357Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#C.B.S.-2009 OOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na NAP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Increase by 200% of the fees payable for gambling licences – Purely domestic situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Joined Cases C-687/24 and C-688/24.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2025 г.
5358Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#C.B.S.-2009 OOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na NAP.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Increase by 200% of the fees payable for gambling licences – Purely domestic situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Joined Cases C-687/24 and C-688/24.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2025 г.
5359Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#UY v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Spikevax – COVID-19 vaccine – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the European Union – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-148/24 P.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2025 г.
5360Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#UY v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Spikevax – COVID-19 vaccine – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the European Union – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-148/24 P.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2025 г.