4701Case C-560/25: Action brought on 20 August 2025 – European Parliament v Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · 20 августа 2025 г.
4702Case C-558/25, Audi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 20 August 2025 – MO v Audi AGcjeu_case · 20 августа 2025 г.
4703Case C-557/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 August 2025 by EO against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 June 2025 in Case T-368/24, EO v Parliamentcjeu_case · 20 августа 2025 г.
4704Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 August 2025.#Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) and Bernard O'Connor v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate – Modification of the form of order sought – Article 86(2) of the Rules of Procedure – Failure to observe the time limit for instituting proceedings – No separate document – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for a direction to be issued – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-458/24.cjeu_case · 20 августа 2025 г.
4705Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 August 2025.#Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) and Bernard O'Connor v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate – Modification of the form of order sought – Article 86(2) of the Rules of Procedure – Failure to observe the time limit for instituting proceedings – No separate document – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for a direction to be issued – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-458/24.cjeu_case · 20 августа 2025 г.
4706Case T-458/24: Order of the General Court of 20 August 2025 – APEDA and O’Connor v Commission (Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate – Modification of the form of order sought – Article 86(2) of the Rules of Procedure – Failure to observe the time limit for instituting proceedings – No separate document – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for a direction to be issued – Manifest lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 20 августа 2025 г.
4707Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 August 2025.#Maryline Stassin v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Decision determining pension rights – Unjust enrichment – Time limit for complaints – Inadmissibility.#Case T-10/25.cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4708Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 August 2025.#Maryline Stassin v European Commission.#Case T-10/25.cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4709Case T-583/25: Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Councilcjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4710Case T-574/25: Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Nutristar v EUIPO – Anielska and Tyrawski (NUTRISTAR)cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4711Case T-572/25: Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Hungary v Commissioncjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4712Case T-571/25: Action brought on 19 August 2025 – Europastry v EUIPO – Rupp (ALMA DE CEREAL)cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4713Case T-10/25: Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Stassin v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Decision determining pension rights – Unjust enrichment – Time limit for complaints – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4714Case C-556/25, Haluška: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky lodged on 19 August 2025 – Haluška, s.r.o. v Okresný úrad Ružomberok, katastrálny odborcjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4715Case C-554/25, Volkswagen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Innere Stadt Wien (Austria) lodged on 19 August 2025 – T.S. v O. GmbHcjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4716Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 August 2025.#Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – OLAF investigation – Rejection of costs – Repayment of the sums advanced – Damages – Locus standi of the defendant – Excusable error – Inadmissibility.#Case T-681/24.cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4717Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 August 2025.#Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) v European Commission.#Case T-681/24.cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4718Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 August 2025.#Manuela Menacho v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Decision determining pension rights – Equal treatment – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Unjust enrichment – Inadmissibility.#Case T-679/24.cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4719Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 August 2025.#Manuela Menacho v European Commission.#Case T-679/24.cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.
4720Case T-681/24: Order of the General Court of 19 August 2025 – Inescop v Commission (Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – OLAF investigation – Rejection of costs – Repayment of the sums advanced – Damages – Locus standi of the defendant – Excusable error – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 19 августа 2025 г.