4621Case T-1/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Kartroi v EUIPO – Luxvide Finanziaria per Iniziative Audiovisive e Telematiche (SANDOKAN) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark SANDOKAN – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4622Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to private life – Plea of illegality.#Case T-1117/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4623Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to private life – Plea of illegality.#Case T-1117/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4624Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#DJO LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing an orthosis for hallux valgus – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-1102/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4625Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#DJO LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-1102/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4626Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#London EV Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2019/631 – Carbon dioxide emission performance standards – New passenger cars – Commission Decision specifying the values relating to the performance of manufacturers and pools of manufacturers of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2021 – Scope – Special purpose vehicle – Wheelchair accessible vehicle – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality.#Case T-1024/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4627Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#London EV Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2019/631 – Carbon dioxide emission performance standards – New passenger cars – Commission Decision specifying the values relating to the performance of manufacturers and pools of manufacturers of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2021 – Scope – Special purpose vehicle – Wheelchair accessible vehicle – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality.#Case T-1024/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4628Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 September 2025.#Philippe Latombe v European Commission.#Transfer of personal data to the United States – Commission Implementing Decision on the adequate level of protection of personal data ensured by the United States – Right to an effective remedy – Right to private and family life – Decisions based solely on automated processing of personal data – Security of the processing of personal data.#Case T-553/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4629Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 September 2025.#Philippe Latombe v European Commission.#Transfer of personal data to the United States – Commission Implementing Decision on the adequate level of protection of personal data ensured by the United States – Right to an effective remedy – Right to private and family life – Decisions based solely on the automated processing of personal data – Security of the processing of personal data.#Case T-553/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4630Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 September 2025.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Digital Services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Designation of a very large online platform – Plea of illegality – Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-348/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4631Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 September 2025.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Designation of a very large online platform – Plea of illegality – Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-348/23.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4632Case T-1117/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Usmanov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to private life – Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4633Case T-1102/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – DJO v EUIPO – Hallufix and Huber [Gouttières (bandages chirurgicaux)] (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing an orthosis for hallux valgus – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4634Case T-1024/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – London EV v Commission (Environment – Regulation (EU) 2019/631 – Carbon dioxide emission performance standards – New passenger cars – Commission Decision specifying the values relating to the performance of manufacturers and pools of manufacturers of new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2021 – Scope – Special purpose vehicle – Wheelchair accessible vehicle – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4635Case T-553/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Latombe v Commission (Transfer of personal data to the United States – Commission Implementing Decision on the adequate level of protection of personal data ensured by the United States – Right to an effective remedy – Right to private and family life – Decisions based solely on the automated processing of personal data – Security of the processing of personal data)cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4636Case T-348/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Zalando v Commission (Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Designation of a very large online platform – Plea of illegality – Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4637Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Zásilkovna s. r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for net costs arising from universal service obligations – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 106(2) TFEU – SGEI Framework – Accounting separation of activities falling within the universal service from other activities – Cross-subsidisation – Counterfactual scenario.#Case T-784/22.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4638Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Zásilkovna s. r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for net costs arising from universal service obligations – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 106(2) TFEU – SGEI Framework – Accounting separation of activities falling within the universal service from other activities – Cross-subsidisation – Counterfactual scenario.#Case T-784/22.cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4639Case T-784/22: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Zásilkovna v Commission (State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for net costs arising from universal service obligations – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 106(2) TFEU – SGEI Framework – Accounting separation of activities falling within the universal service from other activities – Cross-subsidisation – Counterfactual scenario)cjeu_case · September 3, 2025
4640Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2025.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Case T-295/25.cjeu_case · September 2, 2025