Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
4541

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#AR v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Teachers who have acquired professional experience in certain schools that are not operated or organised by the State – Recruitment on a permanent basis at a State school – Determination of length of service for the purposes of determining salary – National legislation not providing for account to be taken of periods of service completed in certain schools not operated or organised by the State – Difference in treatment based on a criterion other than the permanent or fixed-term nature of the employment relationship – Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Applicability – No implementation of EU law.#Case C-543/23.

cjeu_case ·
4542

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#AR v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Teachers who have acquired professional experience in certain schools that are not operated or organised by the State – Recruitment on a permanent basis at a State school – Determination of length of service for the purposes of determining salary – National legislation not providing for account to be taken of periods of service completed in certain schools not operated or organised by the State – Difference in treatment based on a criterion other than the permanent or fixed-term nature of the employment relationship – Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Applicability – No implementation of EU law.#Case C-543/23.

cjeu_case ·
4543

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#AF v Guvernul României and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Health insurance – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 20(1) and (2) – Medical treatment received in a Member State other than the insured person’s Member State of residence – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 7(7) – Assumption of the costs of treatment incurred by the insured person – Reimbursement – National legislation making reimbursement of those costs conditional upon the completion of a medical assessment, carried out exclusively by a health professional belonging to the public health insurance system of the insured person’s Member State of residence, which has given rise to the issuing, by that health professional, of a document authorising the hospitalisation of that insured person – Significant limitation of the reimbursement of the costs of cross-border healthcare.#Case C-489/23.

cjeu_case ·
4544

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#AF v Guvernul României and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Health insurance – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 20(1) and (2) – Medical treatment received in a Member State other than the insured person’s Member State of residence – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 7(7) – Assumption of the costs of treatment incurred by the insured person – Reimbursement – National legislation making reimbursement of those costs conditional upon the completion of a medical assessment, carried out exclusively by a health professional belonging to the public health insurance system of the insured person’s Member State of residence, which has given rise to the issuing, by that health professional, of a document authorising the hospitalisation of that insured person – Significant limitation of the reimbursement of the costs of cross-border healthcare.#Case C-489/23.

cjeu_case ·
4545

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#European Data Protection Supervisor v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors of a banking institution following the resolution of that institution – Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor finding that the Single Resolution Board failed to fulfil its obligations relating to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 15(1)(d) – Obligation to inform the data subject – Transmission of pseudonymised data to a third party – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘personal data’ – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘pseudonymisation’.#Case C-413/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4546

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#European Data Protection Supervisor v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors of a banking institution following the resolution of that institution – Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor finding that the Single Resolution Board failed to fulfil its obligations relating to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 15(1)(d) – Obligation to inform the data subject – Transmission of pseudonymised data to a third party – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘personal data’ – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘pseudonymisation’.#Case C-413/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4547

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Digital Single Market – Copyright and related rights – Failure to transpose and notify the transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Date on which the infringement was brought to an end.#Case C-201/23.

cjeu_case ·
4548

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Digital Single Market – Copyright and related rights – Failure to transpose and notify the transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Date on which the infringement was brought to an end.#Case C-201/23.

cjeu_case ·
4550

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 4 September 2025.#FB v European Lotto and Betting Ltd and Deutsche Lotto-und Sportwetten ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Prim’Awla tal-Qorti Ċivili.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Holder of a licence issued by a Member State authorising the organisation of online games of chance – Legislation of another Member State making the organisation of online games of chance subject to authorisation – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Online slot machines – Secondary lotteries – Recovery of lost stakes – Abuse of law.#Case C-440/23.

cjeu_case ·
4551

Case C-726/23, Arcomet Towercranes: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Romania) – SC Arcomet Towercranes SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii Bucureşti (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Scope of VAT – Article 2(1)(c) – Concept of supplies of services for consideration – Commercial services provided within the same group of companies – Transfer price – Articles 168 and 178 – Right to deduct VAT – Supporting documents)

cjeu_case ·
4552

Case C-655/23, Quirin Privatbank: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – IP v Quirin Privatbank AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Rights of the data subject – Article 17 – Right to erasure of data – Article 18 – Right to restriction of processing – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Unlawful processing of personal data – Action seeking an order requiring the controller to refrain from any further unlawful processing in the future – Basis – Conditions – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation – Concept of non-material damage – Assessment of the compensation – Possible consideration of the degree of fault on the part of the controller – Possible impact of the grant of a prohibitory injunction)

cjeu_case ·
4553

Case C-543/23, Gnattai: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Padova – Italy) – AR v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Teachers who have acquired professional experience in certain schools that are not operated or organised by the State – Recruitment on a permanent basis at a State school – Determination of length of service for the purposes of determining salary – National legislation not providing for account to be taken of periods of service completed in certain schools not operated or organised by the State – Difference in treatment based on a criterion other than the permanent or fixed-term nature of the employment relationship – Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Applicability – No implementation of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
4554

Case C-489/23, Casa Judeţeană de Asigurări de Sănătate Mureș and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Romania) – AF v Guvernul României, Ministerul Sănătăţii and Casa Judeţeană de Asigurări de Sănătate Mureș (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Health insurance – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 20(1) and (2) – Medical treatment received in a Member State other than the insured person’s Member State of residence – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 7(7) – Assumption of the costs of treatment incurred by the insured person – Reimbursement – National legislation making reimbursement of those costs conditional upon the completion of a medical assessment, carried out exclusively by a health professional belonging to the public health insurance system of the insured person’s Member State of residence, which has given rise to the issuing, by that health professional, of a document authorising the hospitalisation of that insured person – Significant limitation of the reimbursement of the costs of cross-border healthcare)

cjeu_case ·
4555

Case C-413/23 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – EDPS v SRB (Concept of personal data) (Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors of a banking institution following the resolution of that institution – Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor finding that the Single Resolution Board failed to fulfil its obligations relating to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 15(1)(d) – Obligation to inform the data subject – Transmission of pseudonymised data to a third party – Article 3(1) – Concept of personal data – Article 3(6) – Concept of pseudonymisation)

cjeu_case ·
4556

Case C-201/23: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – Commission v Poland (Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Digital Single Market – Copyright and related rights – Failure to transpose and notify the transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Date on which the infringement was brought to an end)

cjeu_case ·
4557

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Studio Legale Ughi e Nunziante v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of non-privileged parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Representation of a law firm by a partner of that firm – Lawyer having the status of third party in respect of the applicant – Presumption of independence – Rebuttal of the presumption – Conditions.#Case C-776/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
4558

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Studio Legale Ughi e Nunziante v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of non-privileged parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Representation of a law firm by a partner of that firm – Lawyer having the status of third party in respect of the applicant – Presumption of independence – Rebuttal of the presumption – Conditions.#Case C-776/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
4559

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#C.J.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Conditions for an executing Member State’s assumption of responsibility for the execution of that sentence – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘finally judged … in respect of the same acts’ – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Article 25 – Compliance with the conditions and procedure laid down by the framework decision in the event that a Member State undertakes to enforce a sentence handed down by a judgment delivered by an issuing State – Requirement of consent on the part of the issuing State as regards another Member State’s assumption of responsibility for the enforcement of such a sentence – Article 4 – Possibility for the issuing State to forward the judgment and certificate referred to in that article to the executing State – Consequences where forwarding does not take place – Principle of sincere cooperation – Article 22 – Right of the issuing State to enforce that sentence – Maintenance of the European arrest warrant – Obligation on the part of the executing judicial authority to enforce a European arrest warrant.#Case C-305/22.

cjeu_case ·
4560

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#C.J.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Conditions for an executing Member State’s assumption of responsibility for the execution of that sentence – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘finally judged … in respect of the same acts’ – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Article 25 – Compliance with the conditions and procedure laid down by the framework decision in the event that a Member State undertakes to enforce a sentence handed down by a judgment delivered by an issuing State – Requirement of consent on the part of the issuing State as regards another Member State’s assumption of responsibility for the enforcement of such a sentence – Article 4 – Possibility for the issuing State to forward the judgment and certificate referred to in that article to the executing State – Consequences where forwarding does not take place – Principle of sincere cooperation – Article 22 – Right of the issuing State to enforce that sentence – Maintenance of the European arrest warrant – Obligation on the part of the executing judicial authority to enforce a European arrest warrant.#Case C-305/22.

cjeu_case ·