41661Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Eglo Leuchten GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing lighting apparatus — Ground for invalidity — Prior design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-766/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41662Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Frederik Duym v Council of the European Union.#Civil service — Officials — Appointment to a post of head of unit — Vacancy notice — Rejection of an application — Appointment of another candidate — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Interests of the service — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-549/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41663Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Swemac Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SWEMAC — Earlier national company name or trade name SWEMAC Medical Appliances AB — Relative ground for refusal — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-287/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41664Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Swemac Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SWEMAC — Earlier national company name or trade name SWEMAC Medical Appliances AB — Relative ground for refusal — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-287/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41665Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 February 2019.#RK v Council of the European Union.#Civil service — Officials — Article 42c of the Staff Regulations — Placing official on leave in the interests of the service — Equal treatment — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Manifest error of assessment — Right to be heard — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Responsibility.#Case T-11/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41666Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 February 2019.#RK v Council of the European Union.#Civil service — Officials — Article 42c of the Staff Regulations — Placing official on leave in the interests of the service — Equal treatment — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Manifest error of assessment — Right to be heard — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Responsibility.#Case T-11/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41667Case T-789/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — TecAlliance v EUIPO — Siemens (TecDocPower) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark TecDocPower — Earlier EU word and figurative marks TECDOC and TecDoc — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of earlier marks — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41668Case T-767/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Eglo Leuchten v EUIPO — Briloner Leuchten (Lamp) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a light fitting — Ground for invalidity — Earlier design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41669Case T-766/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Eglo Leuchten v EUIPO — Di-Ka (Lamp) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a lighting fitting — Ground for invalidity — Earlier Community design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41670Case T-656/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials — Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL — Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41671Case T-549/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Duym v Council (Civil service — Officials — Appointment to a post of head of unit — Vacancy notice — Rejection of an application — Appointment of another candidate — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Interests of the service — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of non-discrimination)cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41672Case T-287/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Swemac Innovation v EUIPO — SWEMAC Medical Appliances (SWEMAC) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SWEMAC — Earlier national company name or trade name SWEMAC Medical Appliances AB — Relative ground for refusal — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court)cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41673Case T-11/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — RK v Council (Civil service — Officials — Article 42c of the Staff Regulations — Placing official on leave in the interests of the service — Equal treatment — Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of age — Manifest error of assessment — Right to be heard — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Responsibility)cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41674Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 7 février 2019.#Eugen Bogatu contre Minister for Social Protection.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Article 67 – Demande de prestations familiales présentée par une personne ayant cessé d’exercer une activité salariée dans l’État membre compétent mais continuant d’y résider – Droit à des prestations familiales pour les membres de la famille résidant dans un autre État membre – Conditions d’éligibilité.#Affaire C-322/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41675Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Eugen Bogatu v Minister for Social Protection.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 67 — Application for family benefits submitted by a person who has ceased to pursue an activity as an employed person in the competent Member State but continues to reside there — Entitlement to family benefits for family members resident in another Member State — Eligibility conditions.#Case C-322/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41676Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 7 February 2019.#Ellinika Nafpigeia AE v Panagiotis Anagnostopoulos and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Areios Pagos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2001/23/EC — Scope — Transfer of part of an undertaking — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Concept of ‘transfer’ — Concept of ‘economic entity’ — Transfer of part of the economic activity of a parent company to a newly created subsidiary — Identity — Autonomy — Pursuit of an economic activity — Criterion requiring stability of the pursuit of an economic activity — Recourse to factors of production of third parties — Intention to liquidate the entity transferred.#Case C-664/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41677Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 7 February 2019.#Prenatal S.A. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Imports of textile products incorrectly declared as originating in Jamaica – Post-clearance recovery of import duties – Request for remission of duties – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Common customs code – Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 – Rejection decision of the European Commission in a special case – Validity.#Case C-589/17.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41678Case C-322/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Eugen Bogatu v Minister for Social Protection (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 67 — Application for family benefits submitted by a person who has ceased to pursue an activity as an employed person in the competent Member State but continues to reside there — Entitlement to family benefits for family members resident in another Member State — Eligibility conditions)cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41679Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and Others v European Investment Bank.#Civil service — EIB staff — Pensions — 2008 Reform — Increase in the rate of contributions — Subsequent pay slips — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility.#Case T-487/16.cjeu_case · 7 février 2019
41680Case T-487/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Pensions — 2008 Reform — Increase in the rate of contributions — Subsequent pay slips — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 7 février 2019