Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
41041

Case C-293/18: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia — Spain) — Sindicato Nacional de CCOO de Galicia v Unión General de Trabajadores de Galicia (UGT), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Confederación Intersindical Galega (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clauses 2 and 3 — Definition of ‘fixed-term worker’ — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Comparability of situations — Justification — Compensation in the event of the termination of a permanent employment contract on an objective ground — No compensation on expiry of a fixed-term pre-doctoral employment contract)

cjeu_case ·
41042

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Préfet des Pyrénées-Orientales v Abdelaziz Arib and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Border control, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Article 32 — Temporary reintroduction of border control, by a Member State, at its internal borders — Illegal entry of a third-country national — Equation of internal borders with external borders — Directive 2008/115/EC — Scope — Article 2(2)(a).#Case C-444/17.

cjeu_case ·
41043

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Préfet des Pyrénées-Orientales v Abdelaziz Arib and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Border control, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Article 32 — Temporary reintroduction of border control, by a Member State, at its internal borders — Illegal entry of a third-country national — Equation of internal borders with external borders — Directive 2008/115/EC — Scope — Article 2(2)(a).#Case C-444/17.

cjeu_case ·
41044

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Bashar Ibrahim and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Taus Magamadov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of subsidiary protection in another Member State — Article 52 — Scope ratione temporis of that directive — Articles 4 and 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Systemic flaws in the asylum procedure in that other Member State — Systematic rejection of applications for asylum — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted subsidiary protection in that other State.#Joined Cases C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17.

cjeu_case ·
41045

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Bashar Ibrahim and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Taus Magamadov.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of subsidiary protection in another Member State — Article 52 — Scope ratione temporis of that directive — Articles 4 and 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Systemic flaws in the asylum procedure in that other Member State — Systematic rejection of applications for asylum — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted subsidiary protection in that other State.#Joined Cases C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17.

cjeu_case ·
41046

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Abubacarr Jawo v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Concept of ‘absconding’ — Modalities of extending the time limit for transfer — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of inhuman or degrading treatment on completion of the asylum procedure — Living conditions of beneficiaries of international protection in that Member State.#Case C-163/17.

cjeu_case ·
41047

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Abubacarr Jawo v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Concept of ‘absconding’ — Modalities of extending the time limit for transfer — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of inhuman or degrading treatment on completion of the asylum procedure — Living conditions of beneficiaries of international protection in that Member State.#Case C-163/17.

cjeu_case ·
41048

Case C-444/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Préfet des Pyrénées-Orientales v Abdelaziz Arib, Procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Montpellier, Procureur général près la cour d’appel de Montpellier (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Border control, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Article 32 — Temporary reintroduction of border control by a Member State at its internal borders — Illegal entry of a third-country national — Equation of internal borders with external borders — Directive 2008/115/EC — Scope — Article 2(2)(a))

cjeu_case ·
41049

Joined Cases C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bashar Ibrahim (C-297/17), Mahmud Ibrahim and Others (C-318/17), Nisreen Sharqawi, Yazan Fattayrji, Hosam Fattayrji (C-319/17) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Taus Magamadov (C-438/17) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of subsidiary protection in another Member State — Article 52 — Scope ratione temporis of that directive — Articles 4 and 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Systemic flaws in the asylum procedure in that other Member State — Systematic rejection of applications for asylum — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted subsidiary protection in that other State)

cjeu_case ·
41050

Case C-163/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — Abubacarr Jawo v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Concept of ‘absconding’ — Modalities of extending the time limit for transfer — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of inhuman or degrading treatment on completion of the asylum procedure — Living conditions of beneficiaries of international protection in that Member State)

cjeu_case ·
41051

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 March 2019.#Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for net cost arising from universal service obligations – Decision declaring aid compatible with the internal market – Actions for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16.

cjeu_case ·
41052

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 March 2019.#Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for net cost arising from universal service obligations – Decision declaring aid compatible with the internal market – Actions for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16.

cjeu_case ·
41053

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 March 2019.#Italian Republic and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Measures adopted by a consortium of banks governed by private law for the benefit of one of its members — Measures authorised by the Central Bank of the Member State — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Definition of State aid — Whether imputable to the State — State resources.#Joined Cases T-98/16, T-196/16 and T-198/16.

cjeu_case ·
41054

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 March 2019.#Italian Republic and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Measures adopted by a consortium of banks governed by private law for the benefit of one of its members — Measures authorised by the Central Bank of the Member State — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Definition of State aid — Whether imputable to the State — State resources.#Joined Cases T-98/16, T-196/16 and T-198/16.

cjeu_case ·
41055

Joined Cases T-282/16 and T/283/16: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019 — Inpost Paczkomaty and Inpost v Commission (State aid — Postal sector — Compensation of the net costs resulting from universal service obligations — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business)

cjeu_case ·
41056

Joined Cases T-98/16, T 196/16 and T-198/16: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019 — Italy and Others v Commission (State aid — Intervention by a consortium governed by private law of banks in favour of one of its members — Intervention authorised by the Central Bank of the Member State — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Definition of State aid — Whether imputable to the State — State resources)

cjeu_case ·