4081Case C-338/25 P: Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2025 – Ponomarenko v Councilcjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4082Case C-265/25, Barth Präzisionstechnik and Others: Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg – Germany) – Barth Präzisionstechnik GmbH, ZW, BX, SR v Volkswagen AG, Audi AG (Approximation of laws – Motor vehicles – Infringement of the obligation of manufacturers to place on the market compliant vehicles – Right to compensation for damage caused to the purchaser – Circumstances precluding liability for the damage – Method of calculating compensation)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4083Case C-40/25, CRIF: Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien – Austria) – CRIF GmbH v YOcjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4084Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 September 2025.#A. B. v Skarb Państwa – Państwowe Gospodarstwo Leśne Lasy Państwowe Nadleśnictwa C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principle of judicial independence – Examination of the case on appeal by a single-Judge formation – Option for the president of the court to refer the case to a three-Judge formation – Question of a hypothetical nature – Impossibility, for the referring court to take into account, under its domestic law, any answer given by the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-542/24.cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4085Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 September 2025.#A. B. v Skarb Państwa – Państwowe Gospodarstwo Leśne Lasy Państwowe Nadleśnictwa C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principle of judicial independence – Examination of the case on appeal by a single-Judge formation – Option for the president of the court to refer the case to a three-Judge formation – Question of a hypothetical nature – Impossibility, for the referring court to take into account, under its domestic law, any answer given by the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-542/24.cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4086Case C-638/24 P: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 30 September 2025 – EUCAP Sahel Niger v Marco Montanaricjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4087Case C-542/24, Maski: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku – Poland) – A. B. v Skarb Państwa – Państwowe Gospodarstwo Leśne Lasy Państwowe Nadleśnictwo C. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principle of judicial independence – Examination of the case on appeal by a single-Judge formation – Option for the president of the court to refer the case to a three-Judge formation – Question of a hypothetical nature – Impossibility, for the referring court to take into account, under its domestic law, any answer given by the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4088Joined Cases C-388/24 and C-389/24, Oguta and Others: Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze – Italy) – GK (C-388/24), QS, OY, LH, WM (C-389/24) v Ministero dell’Interno, Commissione Territoriale per la Protezione Internazionale di Firenze – Sezione di Perugia, Commissione Territoriale per la Protezione Internazionale di Firenze – Sezione di Livorno (C-389/24)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2025
4089Case T-675/25: Action brought on 29 September 2025 – Royal v EUIPO (ROYAL)cjeu_case · 29 septembre 2025
4090Case C-642/25 P: Appeal brought on 29 September 2025 by Dragoș Ionuţ Onescu against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 September 2025 in Case T-299/25, Onescu v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 septembre 2025
4091Case C-636/25 P: Appeal brought on 29 September 2025 by Fritz Egger GmbH & Co. OG, Kronospan GmbH, Fundermax GmbH, KremsChem Austria, formerly Metadynea Austria GmbH, Pfleiderer Deutschland GmbH and Unilin BV against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 9 July 2025 in Case T-163/23, Fritz Egger and others v ECHAcjeu_case · 29 septembre 2025
4092Case T-671/25: Action brought on 27 September 2025 – TNG Stadtnetz v Commissioncjeu_case · 27 septembre 2025
4093Case T-661/25: Action brought on 27 September 2025 – De Capitani v EUAAcjeu_case · 27 septembre 2025
4094Case T-669/25: Action brought on 26 September 2025 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Euro Games Technology (100 SUPER HOT)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2025
4095Case T-668/25: Action brought on 26 September 2025 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Euro Games Technology (20 SUPER HOT)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2025
4096Case T-667/25: Action brought on 26 September 2025 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Euro Games Technology (ULTIMATE HOT)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2025
4097Case T-666/25: Action brought on 26 September 2025 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Euro Games Technology (SUPREME HOT)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2025
4098Case T-665/25: Action brought on 26 September 2025 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Euro Games Technology (EXTREMELY HOT)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2025
4099Case T-662/25: Action brought on 26 September 2025 – Wölken v Commissioncjeu_case · 26 septembre 2025