39961Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (Extracts).#Holzer y Cia, SA de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word and figurative marks ANN TAYLOR and AT ANN TAYLOR — Absolute ground for invalidity — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Bad faith.#Joined Cases T-3/18 and T-4/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39962Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (Extracts).#Holzer y Cia, SA de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word and figurative marks ANN TAYLOR and AT ANN TAYLOR — Absolute ground for invalidity — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Bad faith.#Joined Cases T-3/18 and T-4/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39963Case T-609/18: Order of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Fujifilm Recording Media v EUIPO — iTernity (d:ternity) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Application for the EU word mark d:ternity — Earlier word mark iTernity — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity before the action was brought — Invalidation of the contested decision — No interest in bringing proceedings — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39964Case T-439/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Sintokogio v EUIPO (ProAssist) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark ProAssist — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39965Case T-364/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Arçelik v EUIPO (MicroGarden) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MicroGarden — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39966Case T-312/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Dentsply De Trey v EUIPO — IDS (AQUAPRINT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark AQUAPRINT — Earlier national word marks AQUACEM and national unregistered marks AQUACEM and AQUASIL — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action for passing off — No misrepresentation)cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39967Joined Cases T-3/18 and T-4/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Holzer y Cia v EUIPO — Annco (ANN TAYLOR and AT ANN TAYLOR) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word and figurative marks ANN TAYLOR and AT ANN TAYLOR — Absolute ground for invalidity — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Bad faith)cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39968Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 23 mai 2019.#Christian Fülla contre Toolport GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 1999/44/CE – Défaut de conformité du bien livré – Article 3 – Droit du consommateur à la mise du bien dans un état conforme sans frais, dans un délai raisonnable et sans inconvénient majeur – Détermination du lieu où le consommateur est tenu de mettre un bien acheté à distance à la disposition du vendeur, pour sa mise dans un état conforme – Notion de mise du bien dans un état conforme “sans frais” – Droit du consommateur à la résolution du contrat.#Affaire C-52/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39969Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Christian Fülla v Toolport GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Norderstedt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 1999/44/EC — Lack of conformity of the goods delivered — Article 3 — Right of the consumer to repair or replacement of the goods free of charge, within a reasonable time and without any significant inconvenience — Determination of where the consumer must make goods acquired under a distance contract available to the seller to be brought into conformity — Concept of bringing the goods into conformity ‘free of charge’ — Right of the consumer to rescind the contract.#Case C-52/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39970Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 23 May 2019.#Lexitor Sp. z o.o v Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo - Kredytowa im. Franciszka Stefczyka and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Wschód w Lublinie z siedzibą w Świdniku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Credit agreements for consumers — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 16(1) — Early repayment — Right of the consumer to a reduction in the total cost of the credit, consisting of the interest and the costs for the remaining duration of the contract.#Case C-383/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39971Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 23 May 2019.#Alain Flausch and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice — Date from which the time for bringing proceedings starts to run.#Case C-280/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39972Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 23 May 2019.#UPM France v Premier ministre and Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Third subparagraph of Article 21(5) — Exemption of small producers of electricity, subject to the taxation of electricity produced — Lack, during an authorised transitional period, of an internal tax on end consumption of electricity — Article 14(1)(a) — Obligation to exempt energy products and electricity used to produce electricity.#Case C-270/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39973Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 23 May 2019.#Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH v Freistaat Thüringen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Plant variety rights — Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Derogation provided for in Article 14 — Regulation (EC) No 1768/95 — Article 11(1) and (2) — Requests for information — Information provided by official bodies — Request for information on the actual use of material of specific species or varieties — Content of the request.#Case C-239/18.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39974Case C-52/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Norderstedt- Germany) — Christian Fülla v Toolport GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 1999/44/EC — Lack of conformity of the goods delivered — Article 3 — Right of the consumer to repair or replacement of the goods free of charge, within a reasonable time and without any significant inconvenience — Determination of where the consumer must make goods acquired under a distance contract available to the seller to be brought into conformity — Concept of bringing the goods into conformity ‘free of charge’ — Right of the consumer to rescind the contract)cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39975Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Alexandru Negru v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark SkyPrivate — Earlier national word mark SKY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-837/17.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39976Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#KPN BV v European Commission.#Competition — Concentrations — Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services — Full-function joint venture — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Commitments — Relevant market — Vertical effects — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons.#Case T-370/17.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39977Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#KPN BV v European Commission.#Competition — Concentrations — Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services — Full-function joint venture — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Commitments — Relevant market — Vertical effects — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons.#Case T-370/17.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39978Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (Extracts).#Recylex SA and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for lead-acid car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Coordination of purchase prices — Fines — Point 26 of the 2006 Leniency Notice — Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-222/17.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39979Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (Extracts).#Recylex SA and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for lead-acid car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Coordination of purchase prices — Fines — Point 26 of the 2006 Leniency Notice — Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-222/17.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019
39980Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Frank Steinhoff and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – ECB – National central banks – Restructuring of the Greek public debt – Involvement of the private sector – Collective action clauses – Mandatory exchange of Greek bonds – Private creditors – Opinion of the ECB – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Principle of pacta sunt servanda – Article 17(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 63(1) TFEU – Article 124 TFEU.#Case T-107/17.cjeu_case · 23 mai 2019