39181Case C-523/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 9 July 2019 — ED v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39182Case C-522/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 9 July 2019 — DC v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39183Case C-520/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě (Czech Republic) lodged on 9 July 2019 — ARMOSTAV MÍSTEK s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelstvícjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39184Case C-519/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 July 2019 — Passenger Rights spółka akcyjna, with its seat in Warsaw v Ryanair DAC, with its seat in Dublin (Ireland)cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39185Case C-516/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 9 July 2019 — NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbHcjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39186Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#VodafoneZiggo Group BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Electronic communications — Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC — Wholesale provision of fixed access — Joint significant market power — Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators — Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority — Comments of the Commission — Second phase of the procedure not opened — Act not open to challenge — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility.#Case T-660/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39187Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#VodafoneZiggo Group BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Electronic communications — Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC — Wholesale provision of fixed access — Joint significant market power — Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators — Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority — Comments of the Commission — Second phase of the procedure not opened — Act not open to challenge — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility.#Case T-660/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39188Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#Mario Scaloni and Ennio Figini v European Commission.#Action for damages — Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Directive 2014/59/EU and Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — State Aid — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-158/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39189Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#XF v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Temporary change of place of employment — Change of residence.#Case T-482/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39190Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#Hugo's Hotel Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark HUGO’S BURGER Bar — Earlier EU word mark H’ugo’s — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-397/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39191Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#VY v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Middle management post — Rejection of application — Vacancy notice — Selection procedure — Obligation to state reasons — Equality between men and women.#Case T-253/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39192Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Approximation of laws — Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 — Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 — Construction products — Harmonised standards EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-53/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39193Case T-660/18: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — VodafoneZiggo Group v Commission (Action for annulment — Electronic communications — Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC — Wholesale provision of fixed access — Joint significant market power — Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators — Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority — Comments of the Commission — Second phase of the procedure not opened — Act not open to challenge — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39194Case T-158/18: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Scaloni and Figini v Commission (Action for damages — Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Directive 2014/59/EU and Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — State Aid — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39195Case T-482/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — XF v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Temporary change of place of employment — Change of residence)cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39196Case T-397/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Hugo’s Hotel v EUIPO — H'ugo's (HUGO’S BURGER Bar) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark HUGO’S BURGER Bar — Earlier EU word mark H’ugo’s — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39197Case T-253/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — VY v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Middle management post — Rejection of application — Vacancy notice — Selection procedure — Obligation to state reasons — Equality between men and women)cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39198Case T-53/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Germany v Commission (Approximation of laws — Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 — Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 — Construction products — Harmonised standards EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · July 9, 2019
39199Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 9 July 2019.#Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo v Banca d'Italia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2014/59/EU — Banking Union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Annual contributions — Calculation — Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 — Uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Administrative procedure involving national authorities and an EU body — Exclusive decision-making power of the Single Resolution Board — Procedure before the national courts — Failure to bring an action for annulment before the EU Courts in due time — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 — Exclusion of certain liabilities from the calculation of contributions — Interconnectedness of a number of banks.#Case C-414/18.cjeu_case · July 9, 2019