39121Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#CCPL - Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Attributability of unlawful conduct — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Ceiling of the fine — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Ability to pay.#Case T-522/15.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2019
39122Case T-582/15: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Silver Plastics and Johannes Reifenhäuser v Commission (Competition — Cartels — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Evidence of involvement in a cartel — Single and continuous infringement — Principle of equality of arms — ‘Right to confront’ — 2006 Leniency Notice — Significant added value — Attributability of unlawful conduct — 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Upper limit of the fine)cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2019
39123Case T-530/15: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Huhtamäki and Huhtamäki Flexible Packaging Germany v Commission (Competition — Cartels — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Evidence of involvement in the cartel — Single and continuous infringement — Attributability of unlawful conduct — 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines — Proportionality — Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2019
39124Case T-523/15: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Italmobiliaire and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Conditions for the granting of immunity — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Sales value — Ceiling for the fine — Length of the administrative procedure — Reasonable period of time — Ability to pay)cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2019
39125Case T-522/15: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — CCPL and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Attributability of unlawful conduct — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Ceiling of the fine — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Ability to pay)cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2019
39126Case T-500/19: Action brought on 10 July 2019 — Coravin v EUIPO — Cora (CORAVIN)cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39128Order of the Court of 10 July 2019.#Meblo Trade d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to show that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of Union law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-359/19 P.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39129Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#CheapFlights International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘Cheapflights’ — Rejection of the application for registration — Withdrawal of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Effect on incidental submissions.#Case C-170/19 P.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39130Case C-538/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 10 July 2019 — TS, UT, VU v Casa Națională de Asigurări de Sănătate, Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanțacjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39131Case C-528/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 10 July 2019 — F-AG v Tax Office Ycjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39132Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility.#Case T-687/18.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39133Case T-687/18: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39134Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 10 juillet 2019.#EP contre FO.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence en matière de responsabilité parentale – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Article 15 – Renvoi de l’affaire à une juridiction d’un autre État membre, mieux placée pour connaître de l’affaire – Exception à la règle de compétence générale de la juridiction du lieu de résidence habituelle de l’enfant – Lien particulier avec un autre État membre – Éléments permettant de déterminer la juridiction mieux placée – Existence de règles de droit différentes – Intérêt supérieur de l’enfant.#Affaire C-530/18.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39135Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#EP v FO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 15 — Transfer of a case to a court of another Member State better placed to hear it — Exception to the general rule that the court for the place where the child is habitually resident has jurisdiction — Particular connection with another Member State — Evidence making it possible to determine the better placed court — Existence of different rules of law — Best interests of the child.#Case C-530/18.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39136Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 10 juillet 2019.#Nicolas Aubriet contre Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des personnes – Égalité de traitement – Avantages sociaux – Règlement (UE) no 492/2011 – Article 7, paragraphe 2 – Aide financière pour études supérieures – Étudiants non-résidents – Condition liée à la durée de travail de leurs parents sur le territoire national – Durée minimale de cinq ans – Période de référence de sept ans – Mode de calcul de la période de référence – Date de la demande d’aide financière – Discrimination indirecte – Justification – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-410/18.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39137Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality.#Case C-410/18.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39138Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#Caviro Distillerie Srl and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Commercial policy — Dumping — Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/176 — Imports of tartaric acid originating in China and produced by Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 3(2), (3) and (5) — No material harm — Manifest error of assessment — Determination of injury — Evaluation of all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the EU industry — Market share.#Case C-345/18 P.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39139Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 10 juillet 2019.#SIA „Kuršu zeme” contre Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Droit à déduction de la TVA payée en amont – Article 168 – Chaîne de livraisons de biens – Refus du droit à déduction en raison de l’existence de cette chaîne – Obligation de l’autorité fiscale compétente d’établir l’existence d’une pratique abusive.#Affaire C-273/18.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019
39140Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#SIA „Kuršu zeme' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Right to deduct input VAT — Article 168 — Goods supply chain — Refusal of the right to deduct on account of that chain’s existence — Obligation on the competent tax authority to establish the existence of an abusive practice.#Case C-273/18.cjeu_case · 10 juillet 2019