3861Case T-45/25: Order of the General Court of 13 October 2025 – Wyrębski v EUIPO – Gagatek-Woźniak and Others (RED BRAND CHICKEN) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark RED BRAND CHICKEN – Form of a red and white rectangular box – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Res judicata)cjeu_case · 13 octobre 2025
3862Case T-44/25: Order of the General Court of 13 October 2025 – Wyrębski v EUIPO – Gagatek-Woźniak and Others (BLUE BRAND CHICKEN) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark BLUE BRAND CHICKEN – Form of a blue and white rectangular box – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Res judicata)cjeu_case · 13 octobre 2025
3863Case T-746/25, Ryanair: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen (Germany) made on 10 October 2025 – HM and LT v Ryanair DACcjeu_case · 10 octobre 2025
3864Case T-700/25: Action brought on 10 October 2025 – Redbird Corporate Services v Councilcjeu_case · 10 octobre 2025
3865Case T-697/25: Action brought on 10 October 2025 – Bittorrent Marketing and Hochmann Marketing v EUIPO – Rainberry (BitTorrent)cjeu_case · 10 octobre 2025
3866Case T-695/25: Action brought on 10 October 2025 – İlmor Kimya ve Tekstil v Councilcjeu_case · 10 octobre 2025
3867Case C-668/25: Action brought on 10 October 2025 – European Commission v Romaniacjeu_case · 10 octobre 2025
3868Case T-704/25: Action brought on 9 October 2025 – van der Linde v Europolcjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3869Case T-694/25: Action brought on 9 October 2025 – Chemours Netherlands v Commissioncjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3872Case C-667/25, Natural Beauty Levin: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 9 October 2025 – Natural Beauty Levin SRL v Asociația Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (CREDIDAM)cjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3873Case C-666/25, Roma Capitale: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 9 October 2025 – Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Roma Capitalecjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3874Case C-664/25: Action brought on 9 October 2025 – European Commission v Federal Republic of Germanycjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3875Case C-663/25: Action brought on 9 October 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Austriacjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3876Case C-662/25: Action brought on 9 October 2025 – European Commission v Hungarycjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3877Case C-660/25, Bentrac Fuvar: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Egri Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 9 October 2025 – Bentrac Fuvar Kft. v Basalt Stone s.r.o.cjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3878Case T-597/24: Order of the General Court of 9 October 2025 – Khudaynatov v Councilcjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3879Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract – Determination of the court with jurisdiction – Contract of carriage by air concluded between a consumer and a trader – Passenger’s claim for compensation arising from a delayed flight – Assignment of that claim to a collection agency – Claim for compensation brought by the assignee against the air carrier before the court for the place of the aircraft’s departure – Place of performance of the obligation in question – Place in a Member State where, under the contract of carriage, the services were provided or should have been provided.#Case C-551/24.cjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025
3880Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract – Determination of the court with jurisdiction – Contract of carriage by air concluded between a consumer and a trader – Passenger’s claim for compensation arising from a delayed flight – Assignment of that claim to a collection agency – Claim for compensation brought by the assignee against the air carrier before the court for the place of the aircraft’s departure – Place of performance of the obligation in question – Place in a Member State where, under the contract of carriage, the services were provided or should have been provided.#Case C-551/24.cjeu_case · 9 octobre 2025