38301Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019.#FV v Council of the European Union.#Civil service — Officials — Staff reports — 2014 and 2015 appraisal exercises — Interest in bringing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-153/17.cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38302Case T-786/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — BTC v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement entered into in the context of the eTEN framework programme, relating to trans-European telecommunications networks — ‘SafeChemo’ project — Investigation report from OLAF finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible — Repayment in part of the sums paid — Counterclaim)cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38303Case T-783/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 – GE Healthcare v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Suspension of the marketing authorisation for gadolinium-containing contrast agents — Articles 31 and 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Precautionary principle — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Impartiality)cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38304Case T-476/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Arysta LifeScience Netherlands v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance diflubenzuron — Review of approval — Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Rights of the defence — Ultra vires — Manifest error of assessment — Procedure for renewal of approval — Article 14 of Regulation No 1107/2009 — Imposition, in the context of the review procedure, of additional restrictions limiting the use of the active substance at issue without waiting for the outcome of the renewal procedure — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38305Case T-228/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in China and Taiwan — Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties — Normal value — Adjustments — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38306Case T-176/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — WhiteWave Services v EUIPO — Fernandes (VeGa one) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark VeGa one — International registration designating the European Union in respect of the earlier word mark Vegas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38307Case T-153/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — FV v Council (Civil service — Officials — Staff reports — 2014 and 2015 appraisal exercises — Interest in bringing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38308Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019.#FIH Holding A/S and FIH A/S, formerly FIH Erhvervsbank A/S v European Commission.#State aid — Banking sector — Aid granted to FIH in the form of a transfer of its impaired assets to a new subsidiary and the subsequent purchase thereof by the body responsible for guaranteeing financial stability — State aid for banks during the crisis — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Admissibility — Calculation of the amount of the aid — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-386/14 RENV.cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38309Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019.#FIH Holding A/S and FIH A/S, formerly FIH Erhvervsbank A/S v European Commission.#State aid — Banking sector — Aid granted to FIH in the form of a transfer of its impaired assets to a new subsidiary and the subsequent purchase thereof by the body responsible for guaranteeing financial stability — State aid for banks during the crisis — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Admissibility — Calculation of the amount of the aid — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-386/14 RENV.cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38310Case T-386/14 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — FIH Holding and FIH v Commission (State aid — Banking sector — Aid granted to FIH in the form of a transfer of its impaired assets to a new subsidiary and the subsequent purchase thereof by the body responsible for guaranteeing financial stability — State aid for banks during the crisis — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Admissibility — Calculation of the amount of the aid — Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 19 сентября 2019 г.
38311Case T-142/19: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO — Passi (PASSIATA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38312Case T-70/19: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO (LA PASSIATA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38313Case C-694/19 P: Appeal brought on 18 September 2019 by Italmobiliare SpA and Others against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 11 July 2019 in Case T-523/15 Italmobiliare SpA and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38314Case C-691/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 18 September 2019 — Banco Santander, S.A. v VF and WDcjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38315Case C-689/19 P: Appeal brought on 18 September 2019 by VodafoneZiggo Group BV against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 9 July 2019 in Case T-660/18: VodafoneZiggo Group BV v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38316Case C-688/19 P: Appeal brought on 18 September 2019 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 9 July 2019 in Case T-53/18, Federal Republic of Germany v European Commissioncjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38317Case C-687/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 18 September 2019 — Ryanair Ltd v PJcjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38318Case C-686/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 18 September 2019 — ‘Soho Group’ SIA v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrscjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38319Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Registered Community design representing pneumatic power tools — Invalidity proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Expiry of the time limit within which to intervene under Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under that provision — Application, in the alternative, for leave to intervene under Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure made within the time limit — Whether permissible.#Case T-748/18.cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38320Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Registered Community design representing pneumatic power tools — Invalidity proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Expiry of the time limit within which to intervene under Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under that provision — Application, in the alternative, for leave to intervene under Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure made within the time limit — Whether permissible.#Case T-748/18.cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.