Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,315 documents
37802

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 9 octobre 2019.#NJ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Coopération policière et judiciaire en matière pénale – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “mandat d’arrêt européen” – Exigences minimales dont dépend la validité – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Notion d’“autorité judiciaire d’émission” – Mandat d’arrêt européen émis par le parquet d’un État membre – Statut – Existence d’un lien de subordination à l’égard d’un organe du pouvoir exécutif – Pouvoir d’instruction individuelle du ministre de la Justice – Homologation du mandat d’arrêt européen par un tribunal avant sa transmission.#Affaire C-489/19 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
37803

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.#NJ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.#Case C-489/19 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
37804

Case C-489/19 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin — Germany) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against NJ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of “issuing judicial authority” — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission)

cjeu_case ·
37805

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2019.#Esim Chemicals GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ESIM Chemicals — Earlier national word mark ESKIM — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-713/18.

cjeu_case ·
37806

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2019.#Esim Chemicals GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ESIM Chemicals — Earlier national word mark ESKIM — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-713/18.

cjeu_case ·
37807

Case T-713/18: Order of the General Court of 9 October 2019 — Esim Chemicals v EUIPO — Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite (ESIM Chemicals) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ESIM Chemicals — Earlier national word mark ESKIM — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
37809

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 9 octobre 2019.#C GmbH & Co. KG et C-eG contre Finanzamt Z.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sixième directive 77/388/CEE – Article 11, A, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Base d’imposition – Subvention directement liée au prix – Règlement (CE) no 2200/96 – Article 11, paragraphe 1, et article 15 – Organisation de producteurs agricoles ayant constitué un fonds opérationnel – Livraisons effectuées par l’organisation de producteurs à ses membres en échange de paiements ne couvrant pas la totalité du prix d’achat – Financement supplémentaire versé par le fonds opérationnel.#Affaires jointes C-573/18 et C-574/18.

cjeu_case ·
37810

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2019.#C GmbH & Co. KG and C-eG v Finanzamt Z.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 11A(1)(a) — Taxable amount — Subsidy directly linked to price — Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 — Article 11(1) and Article 15 — Producer organisation having set up an operational fund — Deliveries made by the producer organisation to its members in exchange for payments not covering the entirety of the purchase price — Additional financing paid by the operational fund.#Joined Cases C-573/18 and C-574/18.

cjeu_case ·
37813

Joined Cases C-573/18 and C-574/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — C GmbH & Co. KG (C-573/18), C-eG (C-574/18) v Finanzamt Z (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 11A(1)(a) — Taxable amount — Subsidy directly linked to price — Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 — Article 11(1) and Article 15 — Producer organisation having set up an operational fund — Deliveries made by the producer organisation to its members in exchange for payments not covering the entirety of the purchase price — Additional financing paid by the operational fund)

cjeu_case ·
37814

Case C-548/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Saarländisches Oberlandesgericht — Germany) — BGL BNP Paribas SA v TeamBank AG Nürnberg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 — Law applicable to contractual obligations — Article 14 — Assignment of claims — Third-party effects)

cjeu_case ·