Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
37562

Case C-212/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — Prato Nevoso Termo Energy Srl v Provincia di Cuneo, ARPA Piemonte (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2008/98/EC — Waste — Used vegetable oils having undergone chemical treatment — Article 6(1) and (4) — End-of-waste status — Directive 2009/28/EC — Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources — Article 13 — National authorisation, certification and licensing procedures that are applied to plants for the production of electricity, heating or cooling from renewable energy sources — Use of a bioliquid as a power source for an electric power plant)

cjeu_case ·
37565

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (Extracts).#Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Toll-motorway concession – Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles – Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue – Shadow tolls – Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance – Concept of State aid – Advantage – Improvement of the concessionaire’s expected financial situation – Criterion of the private operator in a market economy – Article 107(3)(a) TFEU – Regional State aid.#Case T-778/17.

cjeu_case ·
37566

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (Extracts).#Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Toll-motorway concession – Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles – Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue – Shadow tolls – Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance – Concept of State aid – Advantage – Improvement of the concessionaire’s expected financial situation – Criterion of the private operator in a market economy – Article 107(3)(a) TFEU – Regional State aid.#Case T-778/17.

cjeu_case ·
37567

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Rubik's Brand Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Second sentence of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-601/17.

cjeu_case ·
37568

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Rubik's Brand Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Second sentence of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-601/17.

cjeu_case ·
37569

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Austrian Power Grid AG and Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-333/17.

cjeu_case ·
37570

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Austrian Power Grid AG and Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-333/17.

cjeu_case ·
37571

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-332/17.

cjeu_case ·
37572

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-332/17.

cjeu_case ·
37574

Case T-778/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — Autostrada Wielkopolska v Commission (State aid — Toll-motorway concession — Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles — Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue — Shadow toll — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Improvement of the concessionaire’s expected financial situation — Criterion of the private operator in a market economy — Article 107(3)(a) TFEU — Regional State aid)

cjeu_case ·
37575

Case T-601/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — Rubik’s Brand v EUIPO — Simba Toys (Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Second sentence of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
37578

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#SC Topaz Development SRL v Constantin Juncu and Raisa Juncu, née Cernica.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Promissory contract for sale and purchase drafted by the property developer and certified by a notary — Article 3(2) and Article 4(1) — Proof of the negotiated nature of the terms — Presumption — Consumer’s signature of the contract — Article 3(3) — Paragraph 1(d) to (f) and (i) of the Annex — Express forfeiture clause — Penalty clause — Unfairness — Articles 6 and 7 — Possibility for the national court to vary the term found to be unfair.#Case C-211/17.

cjeu_case ·
37579

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#SC Topaz Development SRL v Constantin Juncu and Raisa Juncu, née Cernica.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Promissory contract for sale and purchase drafted by the property developer and certified by a notary — Article 3(2) and Article 4(1) — Proof of the negotiated nature of the terms — Presumption — Consumer’s signature of the contract — Article 3(3) — Paragraph 1(d) to (f) and (i) of the Annex — Express forfeiture clause — Penalty clause — Unfairness — Articles 6 and 7 — Possibility for the national court to vary the term found to be unfair.#Case C-211/17.

cjeu_case ·