Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,315 documents
37349

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Extracts).#Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/18.

cjeu_case ·
37350

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Extracts).#Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/18.

cjeu_case ·
37353

Case T-380/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 — Intas Pharmaceuticals v EUIPO — Laboratorios Indas (INTAS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
37354

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#K.H.K. contre B.A.C. et E.E.K.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 655/2014 – Ordonnance européenne de saisie conservatoire des comptes bancaires – Article 5, sous a) – Procédure d’obtention – Article 4, points 8 à 10 – Notions de “décision”, de “transaction judiciaire” et d’“acte authentique” – Ordonnance nationale d’injonction de payer susceptible d’opposition – Article 18, paragraphe 1 – Délais – Article 45 – Circonstances exceptionnelles – Notion.#Affaire C-555/18.

cjeu_case ·
37355

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#K.H.K. v B.A.C. and E.E.K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 — European Account Preservation Order — Article 5(a) — Obtention procedure –Article 4(8) to (10) — Definition of ‘judgment’, ‘court settlement’ and ‘authentic instrument’ — National order for payment against which an objection may be lodged — Article 18(1) — Time limits — Article 45 — Exceptional circumstances — Definition.#Case C-555/18.

cjeu_case ·
37356

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Profi Credit Polska S.A. contre Bogumiła Włostowska e.a. et Profi Credit Polska S.A. contre OH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 10, paragraphe 2 – Contrats de crédit aux consommateurs – Licéité de la garantie de la créance issue de ce contrat par un billet à ordre émis en blanc – Demande de paiement de la dette cambiaire – Étendue de l’office du juge.#Affaires jointes C-419/18 et C-483/18.

cjeu_case ·
37357

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Profi Credit Polska S.A. v Bogumiła Włostowska and Others and Profi Credit Polska S.A. v OH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy Pragi-Południe w Warszawie and Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu, II Wydział Cywilny Odwoławczy.#References for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 3(1) — Article 6(1) — Article 7(1) — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 10(2) — Credit agreements for consumers — Lawfulness of securing the debt arising under the agreement by means of a blank promissory note — Demand for payment of the debt owed under the promissory note — Scope of the court’s powers and obligations.#Joined Cases C-419/18 and C-483/18.

cjeu_case ·
37358

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Gennaro Cafaro contre DQ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Règlement (UE) no 1178/2011 – Annexe I, point FCL.065 – Champ d’application ratione temporis – Directive 2000/78/CE – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Discrimination fondée sur l’âge – Article 2, paragraphe 5 – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Réglementation nationale prévoyant la cessation automatique de la relation de travail à l’âge de 60 ans – Pilotes d’aéronefs – Protection de la sécurité nationale.#Affaire C-396/18.

cjeu_case ·
37359

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Gennaro Cafaro v DQ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 – Annex I, Point FCL.065 – Scope ratione temporis – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Discrimination on grounds of age – Article 2(5) – Article 4(1) – National legislation providing for the automatic termination of the employment relationship at the age of 60 – Aircraft pilots – Protection of national security.#Case C-396/18.

cjeu_case ·
37360

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Eni SpA contre Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico et Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze et Shell Italia E & P SpA contre Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 94/22/CE – Énergie – Conditions d’octroi et d’exercice des autorisations de prospecter, d’exploiter et d’extraire des hydrocarbures – Redevances – Méthodes de calcul – Indices QE et Pfor – Caractère discriminatoire.#Affaires jointes C-364/18 et C-365/18.

cjeu_case ·