36761Case T-654/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — FF v Commission (Interim relief — Law governing the institutions — Liability of the European Union — Photograph of a man used as a health warning — Action for damages — Application for interim measures — Necessity — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36762Case T-619/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — KF v SatCen (Decision to launch administrative investigation — Application for suspension of a decision — Application for interim measures — Inadmissibility — No urgency)cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36763Case T-267/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — gastivo portal v EUIPO — La Fourchette (Depiction of a fork on a green background) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark depicting a fork on a green background — Earlier EU figurative mark gastivo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36764Case T-266/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — gastivo portal v EUIPO — La Fourchette (Depiction of a fork on a green background) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark depicting a fork on a green background — Earlier EU figurative mark gastivo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36765Case T-255/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Baustoffwerke Gebhart & Söhne v EUIPO (BOITON) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark BIOTON — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36766Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Guy Steifer v European Economic and Social Committee.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Official — Pensions — Pension rights acquired before entering the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Reimbursement of the amount of pension rights not taken into account in the scheme for calculating years of European Union pensionable service — Material new facts.#Case C-727/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36767Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Guy Steifer v European Economic and Social Committee.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Official — Pensions — Pension rights acquired before entering the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Reimbursement of the amount of pension rights not taken into account in the scheme for calculating years of European Union pensionable service — Material new facts.#Case C-727/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36768Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-715/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36769Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-715/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36770Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-714/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36771Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-714/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36772Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-713/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36773Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-713/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36774Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Vans, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — Appeals which have become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Costs.#Joined Cases C-123/19 P and C-125/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36775Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Vans, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — Appeals which have become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Costs.#Joined Cases C-123/19 P and C-125/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36776Case C-917/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 12 December 2019 — Novaol Srl v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Otherscjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36777Case C-916/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 12 December 2019 — Alpha Trading SpA unipersonale v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Otherscjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36778Case C-915/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 12 December 2019 — Eco Fox Srl v Fallimento Mythen Spa and Otherscjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36779Case C-914/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 12 December 2019 — Ministero della Giustizia, in the person of the Minister currently responsible v GNcjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019
36780Case C-910/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 12 December 2019 — Bankia, S. A. v Unión Mutua Asistencial de Seguros (UMAS)cjeu_case · 12 décembre 2019