36342Case T-25/20: Action brought on 17 January 2020 – Deutsche Post v EUIPO – Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a device of a horn)cjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36343Case T-24/20: Action brought on 17 January 2020 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliamentcjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36344Case C-24/20: Action brought on 17 January 2020 – European Commission v Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36345Case C-23/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Klagenævnet for Udbud (Denmark) lodged on 17 January 2020 — Simonsen & Weel A/S v Region Nordjylland and Region Syddanmarkcjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36346Case C-22/20: Action brought on 17 January 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Swedencjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36347Case C-21/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 17 January 2020 — Balgarska natsionalna televizia v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Sofia pri Zentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia za Prihoditecjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36348Case C-20/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 17 January 2020 — E. M. T. v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatridescjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36349Case C-114/18: Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 17 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — Royaume-Uni) — Sandoz Ltd, Hexal AG v G.D. Searle LLC, Janssen Sciences Irelandcjeu_case · January 17, 2020
36351Case T-26/20: Action brought on 16 January 2020 – Forex Bank v EUIPO – Coino UK (FOREX)cjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36352Case C-19/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 16 January 2020 — I.W. and R.W. v Bank BPH Spółka Akcyjnacjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36353Case C-18/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 16 January 2020 — XYcjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36354Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 January 2020.#Hemp Foods Australia Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — No recording of the change in ownership in the international register — No locus standi — Inadmissibility.#Case T-128/19.cjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36355Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 January 2020.#Hemp Foods Australia Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — No recording of the change in ownership in the international register — No locus standi — Inadmissibility.#Case T-128/19.cjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36356Case T-128/19: Order of the General Court of 16 January 2020 — Hemp Foods Australia v EUIPO — Cabrejos (Sativa) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — No recording of the change in ownership in the international register — No locus standi — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36357Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 16 January 2020.#Highgate Capital Management LLP v European Commission.#Appeal — Interlocutory order — State aid — Application for interim measures — Rejection — No need to adopt the interim measures sought — Lack of jurisdiction — Inadmissibility.#Cases C-605/19 P(R) and C-605/19 P(R)-R.cjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36358Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 16 January 2020.#Highgate Capital Management LLP v European Commission.#Appeal — Interlocutory order — State aid — Application for interim measures — Rejection — No need to adopt the interim measures sought — Lack of jurisdiction — Inadmissibility.#Cases C-605/19 P(R) and C-605/19 P(R)-R.cjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36359Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2020.#Telecom Italia SpA and Others v Roma Capitale and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Approximation of laws — Electronic communications networks and services — Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities — Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-368/19.cjeu_case · January 16, 2020
36360Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2020.#Telecom Italia SpA and Others v Roma Capitale and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Approximation of laws — Electronic communications networks and services — Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities — Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-368/19.cjeu_case · January 16, 2020