Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
36268

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 23 janvier 2020.#ZP contre Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Prestations de chômage – Calcul – Défaut de prise en compte du dernier salaire perçu dans l’État membre de résidence – Période de référence trop courte – Salaire perçu postérieurement à la cessation de la relation de travail – Personne ayant auparavant exercé une activité salariée en Suisse.#Affaire C-29/19.

cjeu_case ·
36269

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 January 2020.#ZP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Unemployment benefits — Calculation — Failure to take account of the final salary received in the Member State of residence — Reference period not of sufficient duration — Salary received following the employment relationship coming to an end — Person having previously been active as an employed person in Switzerland.#Case C-29/19.

cjeu_case ·
36271

Case C-29/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht — Germany) — ZP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Unemployment benefits — Calculation — Failure to take account of the final salary received in the Member State of residence — Reference period not of sufficient duration — Salary received following the employment relationship coming to an end — Person having previously been active as an employed person in Switzerland)

cjeu_case ·
36273

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 23 janvier 2020.#Procédure engagée par Energiavirasto.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Article 3 – Protection des consommateurs – Article 37 – Missions et compétences de l’autorité de régulation – Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges – Notion de “partie” – Droit d’exercer un recours contre la décision de l’autorité de régulation – Plainte formulée par un client résidentiel contre une entreprise gestionnaire d’un réseau de distribution d’électricité.#Affaire C-578/18.

cjeu_case ·
36274

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2020.#Proceedings brought by Energiavirasto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3 — Consumer protection — Article 37 — Tasks and powers of the regulatory authority — Out-of-court dispute settlement — Concept of ‘party’ — Right to appeal against a decision of the regulatory authority — Complaint made by a household customer against an electricity distribution system operator.#Case C-578/18.

cjeu_case ·
36275

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 23 January 2020.#Santen SAS v Directeur général de l’Institut national de la propriété industrielle.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Medicinal product for human use — Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products — Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 — Article 3(d) — Conditions for the grant of a certificate — Obtaining the first authorisation to place the product on the market as a medicinal product — Authorisation to place on the market a new therapeutic application of a known active ingredient.#Case C-673/18.

cjeu_case ·
36276

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 23 January 2020.#UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Criteria — Social policy — Directive 2003/88/EC — Scope — Article 7 — Paid annual leave — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clauses 2 and 3 — Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’ — Magistrates and ordinary judges — Difference in treatment — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Concept of ‘objective grounds’.#Case C-658/18.

cjeu_case ·
36277

Case C-578/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Energiavirasto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3 — Consumer protection — Article 37 — Tasks and powers of the regulatory authority — Out-of-court dispute settlement — Concept of ‘party’ — Right to appeal against a decision of the regulatory authority — Complaint made by a household customer against an electricity distribution system operator)

cjeu_case ·