Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
36209

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 January 2020.#Volkswagen AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark CROSS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1)of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-42/19.

cjeu_case ·
36210

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 January 2020.#Volkswagen AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark CROSS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1)of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-42/19.

cjeu_case ·
36216

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 January 2020.#Silgan Closures GmbH and Silgan Holdings, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Agreements between undertakings — Market in metal packaging — Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Article 2(1) –Decision to initiate a proceeding — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility — Act not open to challenge — Effective judicial protection — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.#Case C-418/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
36217

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 January 2020.#Silgan Closures GmbH and Silgan Holdings, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Agreements between undertakings — Market in metal packaging — Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Article 2(1) –Decision to initiate a proceeding — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility — Act not open to challenge — Effective judicial protection — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.#Case C-418/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
36219

Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 29 janvier 2020.#WV contre Service européen pour l'action extérieure.#Recours en annulation – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Retenue sur la rémunération – Absences non justifiées – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Recours en partie manifestement irrecevable et en partie manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-471/18.

cjeu_case ·