3581Case C-500/24, Grupo Massimo Dutti: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – Grupo Massimo Dutti SA v Administracíon General del Estado (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Determination – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 147 – Successive sales)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3582Case C-402/24, Sewel: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht – Germany) – BL v Dr A, acting as liquidator of Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Incorrect or incomplete notification of the projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period – Validity of the redundancies – Article 6 – Penalties)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3583Case C-398/24, Pome: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus – Estonia) – A v B (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Agreement null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of the Member State of the court seised of the case – Concept)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3584Case C-373/24, Ramavić: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Puli-Pola – Croatia) – NI v Republika Hrvatska (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Article 1(3) – Article 2(1) – Concept of working time – Activities of public prosecutors – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Characteristics peculiar to certain specific public service activities – Periods of time on stand-by at the workplace and periods of time on stand-by according to a stand-by system carried out outside of the workplace – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fair and just working conditions)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3585Case C-348/24, Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista, SA v Administración General del Estado (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Customs warehousing procedure – Release for free circulation – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Article 112(3) – Determination of the customs value – Article 214(1) – Relevant point in time for the purpose of determining the customs value – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 97n(2) – Proof of origin of the goods – Article 118(1) and (3) – Period for submission of proofs of origin – Loss of the benefit of preferential treatment – Validity of documents proving the origin of the goods – Article 147 – Successive sales)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3586Case C-321/24, Attal et Associés: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire de Paris – France) – BC v SCP Attal et Associés (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63(1) TFEU – Succession – Mandatory use of a notary for the purpose of drawing up a declaration of succession in a Member State other than that in which the succession was opened – Legislation of that Member State providing that that notary’s fees are calculated on the basis of the total gross assets of the estate – Parallel exercise by the Member States of their powers of taxation – No restriction on the free movement of capital)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3587Case C-146/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 – Fugro v Council (Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3588Case C-134/24, Tomann: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht – Germany) – UR, acting as insolvency practitioner for V GmbH v DF (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Requirement of prior notification of projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – Whether notification meets the requirements of that directive – Not consistent – Validity of the dismissal – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3589Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#X v Maahanmuuttovirasto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark annexed to the EU Treaty and to the FEU Treaty – Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection made by a third-country national – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 18(1)(d) – Obligations of the Member State responsible – Obligation to take back a third-country national whose application was rejected and who made an application in another Member State – Concept of ‘application (for international protection)’ – Special status of the Kingdom of Denmark – Concept of ‘rejection’ – Decision not to extend or renew a temporary residence document – Not included.#Case C-790/23.cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3590Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#X v Maahanmuuttovirasto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark annexed to the EU Treaty and to the FEU Treaty – Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection made by a third-country national – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 18(1)(d) – Obligations of the Member State responsible – Obligation to take back a third-country national whose application was rejected and who made an application in another Member State – Concept of ‘application (for international protection)’ – Special status of the Kingdom of Denmark – Concept of ‘rejection’ – Decision not to extend or renew a temporary residence document – Not included.#Case C-790/23.cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3591Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#KI and FA v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG and Volkswagen Bank GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreement for the purchase of a motor vehicle – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 10(2)(l) – Requirements relating to the information to be included in the agreement – Obligation to specify the late-payment interest rate – Article 14(1) – Right of withdrawal – Commencement of the withdrawal period in the absence of any reference to the late-payment interest rate – Abusive nature of the exercise of the right of withdrawal – Consequences of exercising the right of withdrawal in the context of a credit agreement linked to a vehicle purchase agreement – Consumer’s obligations towards the creditor – Method of calculating compensation for loss of value of the financed asset – Article 14(3)(b) – Payment of interest following withdrawal from a credit agreement linked to a contract for the supply of goods.#Case C-143/23.cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3592Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#KI and FA v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG and Volkswagen Bank GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreement for the purchase of a motor vehicle – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 10(2)(l) – Requirements relating to the information to be included in the agreement – Obligation to specify the interest rate applicable in the case of late payments – Article 14(1) – Right of withdrawal – Commencement of the withdrawal period in the absence of any reference to the interest rate applicable in the case of late payments – Unfairness of the exercise of the right of withdrawal – Consequences of exercising the right of withdrawal in the context of a credit agreement linked to a vehicle purchase agreement – Consumer’s obligations towards the creditor – Method of calculating compensation for loss of value of the financed asset – Article 14(3)(b) – Payment of interest following withdrawal from a credit agreement linked to a contract for the supply of goods.#Case C-143/23.cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3593Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Effectiveness – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 6(6) and (7) – Article 7(1) – Directive 2019/1/EU – Empowering the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market – Article 31(3) – Scope – Mechanism for mutual administrative and judicial assistance between national authorities – Transfer of the file from a competition authority to an authority conducting a criminal investigation – Addition to the file of a criminal investigation of leniency statements and settlement submissions and their annexes – Access to those documents by persons under investigation and other parties to such proceedings.#Case C-2/23.cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3594Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Effectiveness – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 6(6) and (7) – Article 7(1) – Directive 2019/1/EU – Empowering the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market – Article 31(3) – Scope – Mechanism for mutual administrative and judicial assistance between national authorities – Transfer of the file from a competition authority to an authority conducting a criminal investigation – Addition to the file of a criminal investigation of leniency statements and settlement submissions and their annexes – Access to those documents by persons under investigation and other parties to such proceedings.#Case C-2/23.cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3596Case C-790/23, Qassioun: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus – Finland) – X v Maahanmuuttovirasto (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark annexed to the EU Treaty and to the FEU Treaty – Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection made by a third-country national – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 18(1)(d) – Obligations of the Member State responsible – Obligation to take back a third-country national whose application was rejected and who made an application in another Member State – Concept of application (for international protection) – Special status of the Kingdom of Denmark – Concept of rejection – Decision not to extend or renew a temporary residence document – Not included)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3597Case C-143/23, Mercedes-Benz Bank and Volkswagen Bank: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg – Germany) – KI, FA v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG, Volkswagen Bank GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreement for the purchase of a motor vehicle – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 10(2)(l) – Requirements relating to the information to be included in the agreement – Obligation to specify the late-payment interest rate – Article 14(1) – Right of withdrawal – Commencement of the withdrawal period in the absence of any reference to the late-payment interest rate – Abusive nature of the exercise of the right of withdrawal – Consequences of exercising the right of withdrawal in the context of a credit agreement linked to a vehicle purchase agreement – Consumer’s obligations towards the creditor – Method of calculating compensation for loss of value of the financed asset – Article 14(3)(b) – Payment of interest following withdrawal from a credit agreement linked to a contract for the supply of goods)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3598Case C-2/23, FL und KM Baugesellschaft and S: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien – Austria) – FL und KM Baugesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. KG, S AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Effectiveness – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 6(6) and (7) – Article 7(1) – Directive 2019/1/EU – Empowering the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market – Article 31(3) – Scope – Mechanism for mutual administrative and judicial assistance between national authorities – Transfer of the file from a competition authority to an authority conducting a criminal investigation – Addition to the file of a criminal investigation of leniency statements and settlement submissions and their annexes – Access to those documents by persons under investigation and other parties to such proceedings)cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3599Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 30 October 2025.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bergamo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22.cjeu_case · October 30, 2025
3600Order of the President of the Court of 29 October 2025.#Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of the applicant’s funds and economic resources – Applicant for leave to intervene mentioned by name, as a company owned and then formerly owned by that applicant, in the statement of reasons underlying the restrictive measures adopted against it – Effect of those measures on the applicant for leave to intervene – Leave to intervene granted.#Case C-270/25 P.cjeu_case · October 29, 2025