Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
35921

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 February 2020.#Conféderation nationale du Crédit Mutuel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-867/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
35922

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 February 2020.#ruwido austria GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-823/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
35923

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 February 2020.#ruwido austria GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-823/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
35924

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 13 février 2020.#flightright GmbH contre Iberia LAE SA Operadora Unipersonal.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 7, point 1, sous b), second tiret – Compétence spéciale en matière contractuelle – Notion de “lieu d’exécution” – Contrat de fourniture de services – Transport aérien – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Droit à indemnisation des passagers aériens en cas d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Vol à réservation unique confirmée et effectué en plusieurs segments par deux transporteurs aériens distincts – Annulation du dernier segment de vol – Recours en indemnisation dirigé contre le transporteur aérien chargé du dernier segment de vol devant la juridiction dans le ressort de laquelle se trouve le point de départ du premier segment de vol.#Affaire C-606/19.

cjeu_case ·
35925

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2020.#flightright GmbH v IBERIA LAE SA Operadora Unipersonal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Area of freedom, security and justice — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Concept of ‘place of performance’ — Contract for the provision of services — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Right to compensation for flight passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Flight under a confirmed single booking with several connecting flights operated by two separate air carriers — Cancellation of the final leg of the journey — Claim for compensation brought against the air carrier in charge of the final leg of the journey before the court or tribunal which has territorial jurisdiction over the place of departure of the first leg of the journey.#Case C-606/19.

cjeu_case ·
35928

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2020.#„МАК ТURS“ AD v Direktor na Direktsia „Inspektsia po truda“ - Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — National legislation providing for the imposition of a financial penalty of a predetermined minimum amount, not subject to judicial review — Lack of connection to EU law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-376/19.

cjeu_case ·
35929

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2020.#„МАК ТURS“ AD v Direktor na Direktsia „Inspektsia po truda“ - Blagoevgrad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — National legislation providing for the imposition of a financial penalty of a predetermined minimum amount, not subject to judicial review — Lack of connection to EU law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-376/19.

cjeu_case ·
35930

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 13 February 2020.#XR v Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 9.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ – Break during which the employee must remain ready to respond to a call-out within a two-minute time limit – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-107/19.

cjeu_case ·
35931

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 13 February 2020.#Asociaţia “Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor” v TM and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Zărnești.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV – Canis lupus (wolf) – Article 16(1) – Natural range – Capture and transport of a specimen of a wild animal of the canis lupus species – Public safety.#Case C-88/19.

cjeu_case ·
35935

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2020.#Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark DELTA SPORT — Earlier Spanish word mark COLCHON DELTA — Earlier EU figurative mark DELTA — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-387/18.

cjeu_case ·
35936

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2020.#Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark DELTA SPORT — Earlier Spanish word mark COLCHON DELTA — Earlier EU figurative mark DELTA — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-387/18.

cjeu_case ·
35937

Case T-387/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 February 2020 — Delta-Sport v EUIPO — Delta Enterprise (DELTA SPORT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark DELTA SPORT — Earlier Spanish word mark COLCHON DELTA — Earlier EU figurative mark DELTA — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
35940

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2020.#H. Solak v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv).#Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Article 59 of the Additional Protocol — Decision No 3/80 — Social security for Turkish migrant workers — Waiver of residence clauses — Article 6 — Supplementary benefits — Suspension — Renunciation of the nationality of the host Member State — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Residence requirement.#Case C-258/18.

cjeu_case ·