3561Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BL v Dr. A, en qualité de mandataire liquidateur de Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Incorrect or incomplete notification of the projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period – Validity of the redundancies – Article 6 – Penalties.#Case C-402/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3562Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BL v Dr. A, en qualité de mandataire liquidateur de Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Incorrect or incomplete notification of the projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period – Validity of the redundancies – Article 6 – Penalties.#Case C-402/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3563Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#A v B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Agreement null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of the Member State of the court seised of the case – Concept.#Case C-398/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3564Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#A v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Agreement null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of the Member State of the court seised of the case – Concept.#Case C-398/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3565Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 30 octobre 2025.#NI contre Republika Hrvatska.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2003/88/CE – Protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Article 1er, paragraphe 3 – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “temps de travail” – Activités des procureurs du parquet – Directive 89/391/CEE – Article 2, paragraphe 2 – Particularités inhérentes à certaines activités spécifiques dans la fonction publique – Période de garde sur le lieu de travail et période de garde sous régime d’astreinte, effectuées en dehors du temps de travail – Article 31 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Conditions de travail justes et équitables.#Affaire C-373/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3566Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#NI v Republika Hrvatska.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Article 1(3) – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘working time’ – Activities of public prosecutors – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Characteristics peculiar to certain specific public service activities – Periods of time on stand-by at the workplace and periods of time on stand-by according to a stand-by system carried out outside of the workplace – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fair and just working conditions.#Case C-373/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3567Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista, SA v Administración General del Estado.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Customs warehousing procedure – Release for free circulation – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Article 112(3) – Determination of the customs value – Article 214(1) – Relevant point in time for the purpose of determining the customs value – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 97n(2) – Proof of origin of the goods – Article 118(1) and (3) – Period for submission of proofs of origin – Loss of the benefit of preferential treatment – Validity of documents proving the origin of the goods – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-348/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3568Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista, SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Customs warehousing procedure – Release for free circulation – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Article 112(3) – Determination of the customs value – Article 214(1) – Relevant point in time for the purpose of determining the customs value – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 97n(2) – Proof of origin of the goods – Article 118(1) and (3) – Period for submission of proofs of origin – Loss of the benefit of preferential treatment – Validity of documents proving the origin of the goods – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-348/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3569Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BC v S. C. P. Attal et Associés.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63(1) TFEU – Succession – Mandatory use of a notary for the purpose of drawing up a declaration of succession in a Member State other than that in which the succession was opened – Legislation of that Member State providing that that notary’s fees are calculated on the basis of the total gross assets of the estate – Parallel exercise by the Member States of their powers of taxation – No restriction on the free movement of capital.#Case C-321/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3570Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BC v S. C. P. Attal et Associés.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63(1) TFEU – Succession – Mandatory use of a notary for the purpose of drawing up a declaration of succession in a Member State other than that in which the succession was opened – Legislation of that Member State providing that that notary’s fees are calculated on the basis of the total gross assets of the estate – Parallel exercise by the Member States of their powers of taxation – No restriction on the free movement of capital.#Case C-321/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3571Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3572Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3573Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#UR v DF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Requirement of prior notification of projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – Whether notification meets the requirements of that directive – Not consistent – Validity of the dismissal – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period.#Case C-134/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3574Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#UR v DF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Requirement of prior notification of projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – Whether notification meets the requirements of that directive – Not consistent – Validity of the dismissal – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period.#Case C-134/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3575Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 30 October 2025.###cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3578Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 30 October 2025.#TQ v Mr Green Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters – Conditions for issuing – Article 7(1) – Urgency – Real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the claim will be impeded or made substantially more difficult – Nature of that risk – Circumstances which may demonstrate the existence of that risk – Past actions of the debtor – Obstacles to enforcement in the Member State in which that debtor is domiciled – Legislation of a Member State which provides for the inadmissibility of any legal action concerning the lawfulness of providing gambling services from that Member State, which is authorised by the legislation of that Member State, and the obligation on the courts of that Member State to refuse to recognise or enforce any foreign judicial decision delivered following such an action.#Case C-198/24.cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3579Case C-558/24, Corendon Airlines (Postponement of a flight announced in advance): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Landshut – Germany) – Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik AS v Myflyright GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 6 – Concept of delay of a flight – Postponement of a flight announced in advance by the air carrier with confirmation of the new departure and arrival times – Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7(1) – Right to compensation for passengers in the event of delays of three hours or more in the arrival of the flight – Concept of scheduled time of arrival – Determination of the length of the delay)cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025
3580Case C-546/24, Killybegs Fishing Enterprises and Others: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal – Ireland) – PN, Killybegs Fishing Enterprises Ltd., Killybegs Seafoods Unlimited, Killybegs Fishermen’s Organisation Ltd. v Sea Fisheries Protection Authority (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Weighing of fishery products – Article 60(2) – Weighing carried out on landing – Article 61(1) – Weighing carried out after transport from the place of landing – Place of weighing in the event of an inspection – Possibility for the competent authorities to require weighing of fisheries products at the place of landing before the fisheries products are transported elsewhere)cjeu_case · 30 octobre 2025