35261Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 2 April 2020.#Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC and Google Inc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Internet video platform — Uploading of a film without the consent of the rightholder — Proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 8 — Applicant’s right of information — Article 8(2)(a) — Definition of ‘addresses’ — Email address, IP address and telephone number — Not included.#Case C-264/19.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35262Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 2 April 2020.#Supreme Site Services GmbH and Others v Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Jurisdiction — Exclusive jurisdiction — Article 24(5) — Disputes concerning the enforcement of judgments — Action brought by an international organisation and based on immunity from execution, seeking the lifting of an interim garnishee order and a prohibition on the levying of such an order in the future.#Case C-186/19.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35263Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 2 April 2020.#Profi Credit Polska S.A. and Others v QJ and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin – Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie and the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 1(2) – Scope – National provision providing for the maximum amount of non-interest credit costs – Article 3(1) – Contractual term passing on to the consumer costs of the lender’s business activity – Significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties – Article 4(2) – Obligation to draft contract terms in plain intelligible language – Contractual terms which do not specify the services for which remuneration is sought – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(g) – National legislation laying down a method of calculating the maximum non-interest credit cost which may be charged to the consumer.#Joined Cases C-84/19, C-222/19 and C-252/19.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35264Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 2 April 2020.#Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Article 8 – Parliamentary immunity – Activity not connected to parliamentary duties – Publication on the Member’s Twitter account – Article 9 – Parliamentary privilege – Scope – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity.#Case C-12/19 P.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35265Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 2 April 2020.#Asmel societá consortile a r.l. v A.N.A.C. - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Central purchasing bodies – Small municipalities – Restriction to only two organisational models for central purchasing bodies – Prohibition on using a central purchasing body governed by private law and involving the participation of private entities – Territorial restrictions on the activities of central purchasing bodies.#Case C-3/19.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35266Case C-553/19 P: Order of the Court of (Ninth Chamber) 2 April 2020 — International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products — Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products — Delegated Regulation and implementing acts — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU — Lack of direct concern — Article 256(1), second subparagraph, TFEU — Article 58, first paragraph, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — No precise identification of the contested points in the grounds of the judgment under appeal or specific legal arguments in support of the appeal — Arguments seeking to obtain from the Court a mere re-examination of the arguments presented at first instance — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35267Case C-390/19 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Sugar sector — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35268Case C-897/19 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovni sud — Croatia) — Criminal proceedings against I.N. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — EEA Agreement — Non-discrimination — Article 36 — Freedom to provide services — Scope — Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis — Agreement on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway — Extradition to a third State of an Icelandic national — Protection of a Member State’s nationals against extradition — No equivalent protection for nationals of another State — Icelandic national who was granted asylum under national law before acquiring Icelandic citizenship — Restriction of freedom of movement — Justification based on the prevention of impunity — Proportionality — Verification of the guarantees provided for in Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35269Case C-406/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Appeal — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain — Withdrawal of recognition of producer organisations — Non-recovery of aid paid — Burden of proof — Flat-rate financial correction)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35270Case C-384/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Flood risk assessment and management — Directive 2007/60/EC — Article 7(1) and (5), Article 10(1) and (2) and Article 15(1) — Flood risk management plan — Establishment — Public consultation and information — Making available to the European Commission — River basin districts ES 120 Gran Canaria, ES 122 Fuerteventura, ES 123 Lanzarote, ES 124 Tenerife, ES 125 La Palma, ES 126 La Gomera and ES 127 El Hierro (Spain))cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35271Case C-329/19: Judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Condominio di Milano, via Meda v Eurothermo SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Article 1(1) — Article 2(b) — Definition of ‘consumer’ — Commonhold of a building)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35272Case C-20/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — kunsthaus muerz gmbh v Zürich Versicherungs AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Direct life assurance — Directive 2002/83/EC — Articles 35 and 36 — Right of cancellation and cancellation period — Incorrect information concerning the detailed rules for exercising the right of cancellation — Formal requirements for the declaration of cancellation — Lapse of the right of cancellation — Relevance of the policy holder’s status as ‘consumer’)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35273Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Sebastian Veit v European Central Bank.#Civil service — ECB staff — Remuneration — Competitions — Equality of treatment between internal and external candidates — Classification in step.#Case T-474/18.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35274Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Sebastian Veit v European Central Bank.#Civil service — ECB staff — Remuneration — Competitions — Equality of treatment between internal and external candidates — Classification in step.#Case T-474/18.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35275Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Certification procedure — 2016 promotion exercise — Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials authorised to take part in the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence.#Case T-81/18.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35276Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Certification procedure — 2016 promotion exercise — Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials authorised to take part in the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence.#Case T-81/18.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35277Case T-474/18: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2020 –Veit v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Remuneration — Competitions — Equality of treatment between internal and external candidates — Classification in step)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35278Case T-81/18: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2020 –Barata v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Certification procedure — 2016 promotion exercise — Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials authorised to take part in the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence)cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35279Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Application for revision — Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Conditions — No evidence — No fact of such a nature as to be a decisive factor — Inadmissibility.#Case C-577/18 P-REV.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020
35280Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Application for revision — Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Conditions — No evidence — No fact of such a nature as to be a decisive factor — Inadmissibility.#Case C-577/18 P-REV.cjeu_case · April 2, 2020