34401Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#FF&GB Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ONE-OFF – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-707/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34402Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#FF&GB Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ONE-OFF – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-707/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34403Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 10 juin 2020.#eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative e – Marque internationale figurative antérieure e – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-646/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34404Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark e — Earlier international figurative mark e — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-646/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34405Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 10 juin 2020.#Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de déchéance – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale Leinfelder – Absence d’usage sérieux de la marque – Article 58, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Abus de droit.#Affaire T-577/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34406Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Revocation proceedings – European Union word mark Leinfelder – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Abuse of rights.#Case T-577/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34407Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Marc Oosterbosch v European Parliament.#Civil service – Contract staff – Remuneration – Shiftwork allowance – Article 56a of the Staff Regulations – Legal certainty – Principle of legality – Concept of night work.#Case T-131/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34408Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Marc Oosterbosch v European Parliament.#Civil service – Contract staff – Remuneration – Shiftwork allowance – Article 56a of the Staff Regulations – Legal certainty – Principle of legality – Concept of night work.#Case T-131/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34409Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Louis Vuitton Malletier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a chequerboard pattern – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Well-known facts – Distinctive character acquired through use – Overall assessment of the evidence of the distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-105/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34410Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Louis Vuitton Malletier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a chequerboard pattern – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Well-known facts – Distinctive character acquired through use – Overall assessment of the evidence of the distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-105/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34411Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling to connect refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Single head of claim seeking alteration – Implicit application for annulment – Admissibility – Ground of invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal – Position adopted by the Board of Appeal on the failure to comply with a requirement for protection during the procedure – Divergent conclusion in the contested decision – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 and second sentence of Article 63(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-100/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34412Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling to connect refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Single head of claim seeking alteration – Implicit application for annulment – Admissibility – Ground of invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal – Position adopted by the Board of Appeal on the failure to comply with a requirement for protection during the procedure – Divergent conclusion in the contested decision – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 and second sentence of Article 63(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-100/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34413Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#AL v European Commission.#Civil service – Special advisers – Appointment to the post of representative of the European Union in an international partnership body – Appointment of another representative of the European Union – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials – Liability.#Case T-83/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34414Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#AL v European Commission.#Civil service – Special advisers – Appointment to the post of representative of the European Union in an international partnership body – Appointment of another representative of the European Union – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials – Liability.#Case T-83/19.cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34415Case T-846/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Golden Omega v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34416Case T-708/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Bujar v Commissioncjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34417Case T-707/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — FF&GB v EUIPO (ONE-OFF) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark ONE-OFF — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34418Case T-646/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — eSky Group IP v EUIPO — Gröpel (e) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark e — Earlier international figurative mark e — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34419Case T-577/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO — Schafft (Leinfelder) (European Union trade mark — Revocation proceedings — European Union word mark Leinfelder — Lack of genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Abuse of rights)cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020
34420Case T-131/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Oosterbosch v Parliament (Civil service — Contract staff — Remuneration — Shiftwork allowance — Article 56a of the Staff Regulations — Legal certainty — Principle of legality — Concept of night work)cjeu_case · 10 juin 2020