Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
34241

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 juin 2020.#Procédure engagée par Porin kaupunki.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marchés publics – Directive 2004/18/CE – Article 1er, paragraphe 2, sous a) – Marchés publics dans le domaine des services de transport – Accord de coopération entre des communes relatif à l’organisation et à la fourniture des services sociaux et de santé basé sur le modèle dit de “la commune responsable” au sens du droit finlandais – Transfert des responsabilités de l’organisation des services à l’une des communes dans la zone de coopération concernée – Contrat in house – Attribution sans mise en concurrence de services de transport à une société détenue intégralement par la commune responsable.#Affaire C-328/19.

cjeu_case ·
34242

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#Proceedings brought by Porin kaupunki.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 1(2)(a) – Public procurement in the field of transport services – Cooperation agreement between municipalities regarding the organisation and provision of social and healthcare services based on the model of the ‘responsible municipality’ under Finnish law – Transfer of responsibility for the organisation of services to one of the municipalities in the area covered by the cooperation concerned – ‘In-house’ contract – Award of services to a company wholly owned by the responsible municipality without a call for competition.#Case C-328/19.

cjeu_case ·
34245

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 June 2020.#WV v Landkreis Harburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Article 3(b) – Court for the place where the maintenance creditor is habitually resident – Action for recovery brought by a public body subrogated to the claims of a maintenance creditor.#Case C-540/19.

cjeu_case ·
34246

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 18 June 2020.#Ellmes Property Services Limited v SP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 24, point 1 – Exclusive jurisdiction in matters relating to rights in rem in immovable property – Article 7, point 1(a) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract – Legal action brought by a co-owner seeking an order that another co-owner cease the use, for touristic purposes, of immovable property subject to co-ownership.#Case C-433/19.

cjeu_case ·
34247

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 18 June 2020.#BY and CZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 1999/62/EC – Directive 2006/38/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Article 7(9) – Article 7a(1) and (2) – Tolls – Principle of the recovery of infrastructure costs – Infrastructure costs – Operating costs – Costs related to traffic police – Cost overrun – Direct effect – Ex post justification of an excessive toll rate – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-321/19.

cjeu_case ·
34248

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 18 June 2020.#Ingredion Germany GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme – Article 3(h) – New entrants – Article 10a – Transitional rules for free allocation of emission allowances – Decision 2011/278/EU – Article 18(1)(c) – Fuel-related activity level – Second subparagraph of Article 18(2) – Relevant capacity utilisation factor.#Case C-320/19.

cjeu_case ·
34249

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 18 June 2020.#VL v Szpital Kliniczny im. dra J. Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 2(1) and (2)(a) and (b) – ‘Concept of discrimination’ – Direct discrimination – Indirect discrimination – Discrimination on grounds of disability – Difference in treatment within a group of workers with disabilities – Grant of an allowance to workers with disabilities who have submitted disability certificates after a date chosen by the employer – Exclusion of workers with disabilities who have submitted their certificates before that date.#Case C-16/19.

cjeu_case ·
34251

Case C-328/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings brought by Porin kaupunki (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 1(2)(a) — Public procurement in the field of transport services — Cooperation agreement between municipalities regarding the organisation and provision of social and healthcare services based on the model of the ‘municipality responsible’ under Finnish law — Transfer of responsibility for the organisation of the services to one of the municipalities in the relevant cooperation zone — In-house contract — Award of contract for transport services to a company wholly owned by the municipality responsible without a call for tenders)

cjeu_case ·
34255

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 18 juin 2020.#Ryanair Designated Activity Company contre Országos Rendőr-főkapitányság.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Citoyenneté de l’Union européenne – Directive 2004/38/CE – Articles 5, 10 et 20 – Droit d’entrée, dans un État membre, d’un ressortissant d’un État tiers, membre de la famille d’un citoyen de l’Union – Preuve de la détention d’un tel droit – Possession d’une carte de séjour de membre de la famille d’un citoyen de l’Union – Possession d’une carte de séjour permanent.#Affaire C-754/18.

cjeu_case ·
34256

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#Ryanair Designated Activity Company v Országos Rendőr-főkapitányság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the European Union — Directive 2004/38/CE — Articles 5, 10 and 20 — Right of entry to a Member State of a third-country national who is a member of the family of an EU citizen — Evidence of holding such a right — Possession of a residence card of a family member of a Union citizen — Possession of a permanent residence card.#Case C-754/18.

cjeu_case ·
34257

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 18 juin 2020.#Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe « Primart » Marek Łukasiewicz contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz – Marque nationale antérieure PRIMA – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 76, paragraphe 1 – Portée du contrôle exercé par le Tribunal de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-702/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
34258

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe „Primart” Marek Łukasiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz — Earlier national trade mark PRIMA — Article 8(1)(b) — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 76(1) — Scope of review by the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-702/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
34259

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 juin 2020.#KH contre Sparkasse Südholstein.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Commercialisation à distance de services financiers – Directive 2002/65/CE – Article 1er – Champ d’application – Contrats portant sur des services financiers comportant une première convention suivie d’opérations successives – Application de la directive 2002/65/CE à la seule première convention – Article 2, sous a) – Notion de “contrat portant sur des services financiers” – Avenant à un contrat de prêt portant modification du taux d’intérêt fixé initialement.#Affaire C-639/18.

cjeu_case ·
34260

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#KH v Sparkasse Südholstein.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Kiel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Distance marketing of financial services — Directive 2002/65/EC — Article 1 — Scope — Contracts concerning financial services consisting of an initial agreement followed by successive operations — Application of Directive 2002/65/EC to the first agreement alone — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘contract concerning financial services’ — Amendment to a loan agreement altering the interest rate initially set.#Case C-639/18.

cjeu_case ·